MedPath

A CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Tinnitus
Interventions
Behavioral: CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
Registration Number
NCT02370810
Lead Sponsor
Anglia Ruskin University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom

Detailed Description

Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed in Europe to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK). It furthermore, aims to establish for which subgroups of tinnitus suffers this iCBT intervention would be a suitable intervention.

Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), with a one year follow-up design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress Setting: This will be an internet-based study for adults with tinnitus living in the UK

Participants: Eligible participants will include adults with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months with internet access and no major medical or psychiatric conditions. 70 participants will be recruited for each group and will be randomly assigned using a computer generated randomization schedule by an independent research assistant after being pre-stratified for age and tinnitus severity.

Intervention: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.

Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life.

Hypothesis: If this intervention proves feasible it is and effective, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
146
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
experimental groupCBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitusCBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
weekly check-in group with delayed treatmentCBT-based internet-intervention for tinnituswill complete weekly measures and commence the treatment once the experimental group completes the intervention
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Tinnitus Functional IndexAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Insomnia Severity IndexAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of sleep problems Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Satisfaction With LifeAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening VersionAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of tinnitus severity to use as a weekly measure Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI-S Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Cognitive Failures QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Patient Health QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Generalised Anxiety DisorderAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Hyperacusis QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening VersionAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Vision and hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin Univeristy

🇬🇧

Cambridge, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath