Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01863550
NCT01863550
Active, not recruiting
Phase 3

Randomized Phase III Trial of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) Versus Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) Followed by Limited or Indefinite Duration Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma (ENDURANCE)

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group916 sites in 1 country1,087 target enrollmentDecember 6, 2013

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Bortezomib
Conditions
Plasma Cell Myeloma
Sponsor
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Enrollment
1087
Locations
916
Primary Endpoint
Progression-free survival for the induction analysis
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
7 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This randomized phase III trial studies bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone to see how well they work compared to carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in treating patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib and carfilzomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Lenalidomide may help the immune system kill abnormal blood cells or cancer cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone are more or less effective than carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in treating patients with multiple myeloma

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the overall survival between two strategies of lenalidomide maintenance following induction with a proteasome inhibitor? immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) combination: limited duration of maintenance (24 months) versus indefinite maintenance therapy until disease progression. II. To compare progression-free survival between bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) and carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRd) induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression-free survival between two strategies of lenalidomide maintenance following induction with a proteasome inhibitor?IMiD combination: limited duration of maintenance (24 months) or indefinite maintenance therapy until disease progression. II. To compare induction rates of response between VRd and CRd arms. III. To evaluate time to progression, duration of response and overall survival between VRd and CRd induction therapy. IV. To compare induction rates of toxicity between VRd and CRd arms. V. To evaluate toxicity during lenalidomide maintenance. VI. To compare minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rates between VRd and CRd arms at end of induction therapy. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the short and long-term health-related quality of life impact between the two strategies of lenalidomide maintenance. II. To compare the impact on health-related quality of life between VRd and CRd induction therapy. III. To evaluate the association between early induction response and change in health-related quality of life. IV. To describe changes in health-related quality of life during the induction, active maintenance and observation phases. V. To evaluate correlation between treatment adherence during maintenance and health-related quality of life. VI. To compare MRD negative rates between the two strategies of lenalidomide maintenance. VII. To compare MRD negative rates between VRd and CRd arms during induction therapy. VIII. To examine patterns of change in MRD levels over time and examine conversion from detectable to MRD negative status. IX. To evaluate agreement and association between International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and MRD based disease-free status. X. To describe the mutational profile of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. XI. To identify mutations associated with resistance to VRd and CRd induction therapy. XI. To identify expression profiles associated with MRD negative status with each induction therapy. XII. To determine the ability of MRD status at induction end to predict short-term and long-term overall and progression-free survival. XIII. To determine the effects of tobacco, operationalized as combustible tobacco (1a), other forms of tobacco (1b), and environmental tobacco exposure (ETS) (1c) on provider-reported cancer-treatment toxicity (adverse events \[both clinical and hematologic\] and dose modifications). XIV. To determine the effects of tobacco on patient-reported physical symptoms and psychological symptoms. XV. To examine quitting behaviors and behavioral counseling/support and cessation medication utilization. XVI. To explore the effect of tobacco use and exposure on treatment duration, relative dose intensity, and therapeutic benefit. OUTLINE: INDUCTION: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients receive bortezomib subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of courses 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of courses 9-12; lenalidomide orally (PO) daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of courses 1-8 and days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of courses 9-12. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM B: Patients receive carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE: After completion of induction therapy (or completion of at least 6 courses in Arm A but stopped early due to unacceptable toxicity, or at least 4 courses in Arm B but stopped early due to unacceptable toxicity), patients are then randomized to 1 of 2 maintenance treatment arms. ARM C: Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 24 courses in the absences of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM D: Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually for 10 years.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 6, 2013
End Date
February 5, 2034
Last Updated
7 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • STEP I: Patients must be diagnosed with symptomatic standard-risk multiple myeloma (SR-MM) as defined by all of the following (except gene expression profile \[GEP\]70 status if unknown):
  • No evidence of t(14;16) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing on bone marrow or not available
  • No evidence of t(14:20) by FISH testing on bone marrow or not available
  • No evidence of deletion 17p by FISH testing on bone marrow
  • FISH should be from within 90 days of registration
  • NOTE: If the FISH result states that no immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) abnormality is present, both t(14;16) and t(14;20) can be considered negative; in addition, if the patient has a t(11;14) or t(4;14) translocation present, they can be considered negative for t(14;16) and t(14;20); if testing for t(14;16) or t(14;20) could not be performed for lack of sufficient material or non-availability of the probe in the test panel, patients can be enrolled on the study
  • Standard Risk GEP70 signature within the past 90 days (only if GEP has been done and results are available)
  • NOTE: GEP testing is NOT a requirement for the study; if the test has been done, patients found to have a GEP70 status of high-risk will not be eligible
  • Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) =\< 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) within the past 28 days
  • No more than 20% circulating plasma cells on peripheral blood smear differential or 2,000 plasma cells/microliter on white blood cell (WBC) differential of peripheral blood within the past 90 days

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Arm A (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of courses 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of courses 9-12; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of courses 1-8 and days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of courses 9-12. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Bortezomib

Arm A (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of courses 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of courses 9-12; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of courses 1-8 and days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of courses 9-12. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Dexamethasone

Arm A (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of courses 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of courses 9-12; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of courses 1-8 and days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of courses 9-12. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Arm A (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of courses 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of courses 9-12; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of courses 1-8 and days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of courses 9-12. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Lenalidomide

Arm A (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive bortezomib SC or IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of courses 1-8 and days 1 and 8 of courses 9-12; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-14; and dexamethasone PO daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of courses 1-8 and days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of courses 9-12. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Quality-of-Life Assessment

Arm B (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Carfilzomib

Arm B (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Dexamethasone

Arm B (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Arm B (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Lenalidomide

Arm B (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Patients receive carfilzomib IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21; and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Quality-of-Life Assessment

Arm C (lenalidomide)

Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 24 courses in the absences of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Arm C (lenalidomide)

Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 24 courses in the absences of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Lenalidomide

Arm C (lenalidomide)

Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 24 courses in the absences of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Quality-of-Life Assessment

Arm D (lenalidomide)

Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Arm D (lenalidomide)

Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Lenalidomide

Arm D (lenalidomide)

Patients receive lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention: Quality-of-Life Assessment

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Progression-free survival for the induction analysis

Time Frame: From the induction randomization until the earlier of progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 15 years

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to describe the progression-free survival function by arm using all data while ignoring maintenance.

Overall survival (OS) for the maintenance analysis

Time Frame: From the maintenance randomization to death due to any cause or, censored at the date last known alive, assessed up to 15 years

The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method will be used to describe the overall survival function by arm. Sensitivity analysis will be done to evaluate OS in the subset of eligible patients and censoring patients at time of non-protocol therapy.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Overall survival for the induction analysis(From induction randomization to death due to any cause, or censored at the date last known alive, assessed up to 15 years)
  • Progression-free survival for the maintenance analysis(From the maintenance randomization until the earlier of progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 15 years)
  • Incidence of overall grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity and grade 3 or higher toxicity by type during induction, active maintenance and observation phases using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0(Up to 15 years)
  • Change in the FACT-Ntx TOI for the short-term maintenance analysis(From the end of 2 years of maintenance to 3 years post maintenance randomization)
  • Change in the FACT-Ntx TOI for the early induction analysis(From baseline (induction randomization) to 2.8 months of induction therapy)
  • Response rates including partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), immunofixation negative complete response (IF-CR) and complete response (CR)(At 2.8 months)
  • Response rates including PR, VGPR, IF-CR and CR(At 8.3 months)
  • Time to progression (TTP) for the induction analysis(From the induction randomization to progression, or censored at the date of last disease evaluation for those without progression reported, assessed up to 15 years)
  • Duration of response (DOR) for the induction analysis(From first objective response (partial response or better) since induction randomization until the earlier of progression or death due to any cause, or censored at date of last disease evaluation for those without events reported, assessed up to 15 years)
  • Incidence of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy and cardiac toxicity during induction phase assessed using CTCAE version 5.0(Up to 36 weeks)
  • Minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rates(At 8.3 months after induction randomization)
  • Change in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity Trial Outcome Index (FACT-Ntx TOI) for the transition to maintenance analysis(From week 36 (the end) of induction therapy to week 24 (end of course 6) of maintenance therapy)
  • Change in the FACT-Ntx TOI for the long-term maintenance analysis(From the end of 2 years of maintenance to 5 years post maintenance randomization)
  • Change in the FACT-Ntx TOI for the end of induction analysis(From baseline (induction randomization) to 36 weeks (end) of induction therapy)
  • Levels and changes in the FACT-Ntx TOI and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM) during induction, active maintenance and observation phases(Up to 15 years)
  • Time to worsening of FACT-Ntx TOI for the induction analysis(From the baseline assessment at induction randomization to a decrease of 7 points, assessed up to 15 years)
  • Time to worsening of FACT-MM for the maintenance analysis(From the baseline assessment at maintenance randomization to a decrease of 4 points, assessed up to 15 years)

Study Sites (916)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials