MedPath

Evaluation of an Alternative Injection Paradigm for OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Patients With Urinary Incontinence

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Interventions
Biological: onabotulinumtoxinA
Drug: Placebo (saline)
Registration Number
NCT03052764
Lead Sponsor
Allergan
Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (BOTOX®), compared to placebo, when injected into the bladder using an alternative injection paradigm in reducing the number of daily urinary incontinence episodes in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and urinary incontinence whose symptoms have not been adequately managed with an anticholinergic.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participant weighs ≥ 40 kg (88 lb)
  • Participant has symptoms of Over Active Bladder (OAB) (frequency and urgency) with urinary incontinence for a period of at least 6 months immediately prior to screening.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participant has symptoms of OAB due to any known neurological reason (eg, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebrovascular accident, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, etc.)
  • Participant has received pharmacologic therapy to treat symptoms of OAB, including nocturia, within 7 days of the start of the screening period procedures
  • Participant uses clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) or indwelling catheter to manage urinary incontinence
  • Participant has been treated with any intravesical pharmacologic agent (eg, capsaicin, resiniferatoxin) within 12 months of Day 1
  • Participant has had previous or current botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition
  • Participant has had previous or current botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any non-urological condition within 12 weeks of Day 1
  • Participant has been immunized for any botulinum toxin serotype
  • Participant has history or evidence of any pelvic or urological abnormalities, bladder surgery or disease, other than OAB, that may affect bladder function
  • Participant has an active genital infection, other than genital warts, either concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to screening
  • Participant has a history or current diagnosis of bladder cancer or other urothelial malignancy
  • Participant is male with previous or current diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Participant has a history of 2 or more urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 6 months of Day 1 or is taking prophylactic antibiotics to prevent chronic UTIs
  • Participant has current or previous uninvestigated hematuria
  • Participant has hemophilia, or other clotting factor deficiencies, or disorders that cause bleeding diathesis
  • Participant cannot withhold any antiplatelet, anticoagulant therapy or medications with anticoagulant effects for 3 days prior to Day 1
  • Participant has a known allergy or sensitivity to any botulinum toxin preparation
  • Participant has any medical condition that may put him/her at increased risk with exposure to BOTOX® including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Participant has current swallowing or breathing difficulties.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 UonabotulinumtoxinAPlacebo (saline) injection into the bladder on Day 1 and a second injection BOTOX® 100 U after Week 12 if applicable.
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 UonabotulinumtoxinABOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) 100 U injection into the bladder on Day 1 and a second injection BOTOX® 100 U after Week 12 if applicable.
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 UPlacebo (saline)Placebo (saline) injection into the bladder on Day 1 and a second injection BOTOX® 100 U after Week 12 if applicable.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence EpisodesBaseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participant recorded urinary incontinence in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of episodes of incontinence as covariates was used for analyses.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete ContinenceBaseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12]

Complete continence is defined as 100% reduction in urinary incontinence from Baseline.

Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Micturition EpisodesBaseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participant recorded the number of micturition episodes in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of UUI episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of micturition as covariates was used for analyses.

Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Urgency EpisodesBaseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participant recorded the number of urgency episode in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of UUI episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of urgency episodes as covariates was used for analyses.

Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Nocturia EpisodesBaseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to, 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participants recorded the number of nocturia episodes in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of UUI episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of nocturia episodes as covariates was used for analyses.

Percentage of Participants Who Have a Positive Treatment Response on the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)Week 12

The participant rated their condition during treatment using the TBS 4-point scale where: 1=greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed or 4=worsened. A positive treatment response is either as score of 1=greatly improved or 2=improved.

Trial Locations

Locations (31)

Urology Clinics of North Texas

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Adult and Pediatric Urology

🇺🇸

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Regional Urology

🇺🇸

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

University of California, Irvine Medical Center

🇺🇸

Orange, California, United States

Orange County Urology Associates

🇺🇸

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Tower Urology

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

PMG Research of Christie Clinic

🇺🇸

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Deaconess Clinic, Inc.

🇺🇸

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Urology of Indiana

🇺🇸

Noblesville, Indiana, United States

Women's Health Advantage

🇺🇸

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Iowa Clinic

🇺🇸

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Beyer Research

🇺🇸

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Chesapeake Urology

🇺🇸

Owings Mills, Maryland, United States

Michigan Institute of Urology, P.C.

🇺🇸

Troy, Michigan, United States

Premier Urology LLC

🇺🇸

Edison, New Jersey, United States

Genitourinary Surgical Consultants

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Urogynecology Associates

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Western New York Urology Associates

🇺🇸

Cheektowaga, New York, United States

Sandhills Medical Center

🇺🇸

Hamlet, North Carolina, United States

Virginia Urology

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley

🇺🇸

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Urologic Consultants of Southeastern Pennsylvania

🇺🇸

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Advanced Urology Centers of NY A division of IMP

🇺🇸

Plainview, New York, United States

Alliance Urology Specialists

🇺🇸

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Center for Pelvic Health

🇺🇸

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Manhattan Medical Research

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Virginia Urology Center

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Integrity Medical Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States

East Coast Institute for Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Urology of Virginia

🇺🇸

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

PMG Research of Wilmington

🇺🇸

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath