Comparison of Insulin Glargine and NPH Human Insulin in Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Registration Number
- NCT00174824
- Lead Sponsor
- Sanofi
- Brief Summary
To compare the progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate diabetic retinopathy treated with insulin glargine vs NPH human insulin.
- Detailed Description
Randomized, open-label assignment of type 2 patients who are on a stable antidiabetic regimen to treatment with either insulin glargine or BID NPH human insulin, with baseline diabetic retinopathy of severity 53/\<53 on the ETDRS scale, for 5 years of followup. Outcomes measured by seven-field fundus photography at baseline, 1.5, 3,6,and 9 months, and annually.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1024
- type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year
- treated with oral antidiabetic agents or insulin at stable doses for at least 3 months
- HbA1c between 6 and 12% inclusive
- baseline retinopathy severity not to exceed 53/<53 on the ETDRS scale
- unlikely to require laser surgery or vitrectomy within upcoming year
- prior treatment with insulin glargine
- treatment with insulin analogs (eg insulin lispro or aspart) in the year prior to enrollment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The percentage of patients with a 3-step or greater progression in the patient level recoded integer ETDRS retinopathy scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The percentage of patients who:develop proliferative retinopathy or develop clinically significant macular edema the distribution of patients on the patient level recoded integer ETDRS retiopathy scale the change from baseline in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose the incidence of hypoglycemia
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
🇨🇦Laval, Canada