IRCT2017101036699N1
Completed
未知
Comparison of anesthetic ef?cacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary primary molar buccal in?ltration during routine dental treatment in 4-6years old children
Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences0 sites74 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 74
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Children aged 4\-6 years old; Children who are 3 or 4 in Frankel's terms of cooperation; Children with primary maxillary first molar teeth need pulpotomy treatment and confirmed radiographic symptoms require pulpal therapy; Children who have no inflammatory lesions (abscess, fistula) in their buccal mucosa; Children who do not desire spontaneous pain or nighttime pain in their teeth;
- •Exclusion criteria: Children who are 1 or 2 in Frankel's terms of cooperation; Children who need to surface restoration of the primary first molar; Children who require tooth extraction of the primary first molar; Children who have inflammatory lesions in their buccal mucosa; Tooth necrosis; Children who have spontaneous pain or nighttime pain in their teeth; Children who have hyperemic pulp after exposation of their teeth; Radiography of irreversible pulpitis symptoms such as internal resorbtion, external resorbtion, PDL dilatation, radiolucency in furca.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% Lidocaine for maxillary Buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. a randomized double- blined clinical trialirreversible pulpitis.IRCT201204302016N5Vice chancellor for research; Kerman University of Medical Sciences50
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Comparative pain management of local anesthetic drugs when placed at the site.CTRI/2018/03/012678R Seshan Rakkesh
Recruiting
Phase 3
Comparing anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine in mandibular bone graftsIRCT20230210057378N1Qazvin University of Medical Sciences20
Completed
Phase 3
Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of Articaine infiltration versus Lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in children pulpotomyAnesthesia in pediatric pulpotomy.IRCT20200622047887N1Rasht University of Medical Sciences40
Completed
Phase 3
The efficacy of articaine in mental injectioocal anesthesia.Local anaestheticsIRCT2015072123278N1School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences64