Comparative Study Between Acrylic and Flexible Dentures
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Interventions
- Procedure: single conventional dentureProcedure: single flexible denture
- Registration Number
- NCT03184883
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
comparing the effect of conventional mandibular single denture with flexible mandibular single denture on tissue and patient's satisfaction
- Detailed Description
comparing the effect of conventional mandibular single denture with flexible mandibular single denture on tissue by keratinization index through PAP stain and patient's satisfaction through a questionnaire
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 17
Inclusion Criteria
- Mandibular flat ridge
- Patient with opposing natural teeth or satisfactory fixed prostheses
- Angle class I Maxillimandibular relationship
- No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathosis
- Non smokers
- Patients with no previous denture experience
- Patients having last extraction at least 6 month before denture construction
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description single conventional denture single conventional denture patients with mandibular edentulous arch by using acrylic resin denture with soft linner single flexible denture single flexible denture patients with mandibular edentulous arch by using flexible lower denture
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cytological changes manifested as keratinization index 6 months Objective Outcome: measuring the cytological changes manifested as keratinization index
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method