TCTR20191209004
Completed
Not Applicable
The comparison of efficacy between the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block with pooximal adductor canal block versus proximal adductor canal block alone for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
none0 sites80 target enrollmentDecember 9, 2019
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- OA Knee going on total knee arthroplasty
- Sponsor
- none
- Enrollment
- 80
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient who was scheduled for total knee arthroplasty at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital ASA class 1 to 3
- •ASA class 1 A normal healthy patient
- •ASA class 2 A patient with mild systemic disease Mild diseases only without substantive functional limitations
- •ASA class 3 A patient with severe systemic disease but not threaten to life
- •Body mass index BMI between 18 to 40 kg m2
Exclusion Criteria
- •refuse to participate this study
- •unable to cooperate or cognitive impairment eg dementia
- •allergy to any drug in this study
- •contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia eg coagulopathy
- •received intraoperative periarticular injection
- •contraindication to NSAIDs Ketorolac and Celebrex in this study
- •chronic opioids use or diagnosed of neuropathic pain
- •unable to performed Time up and go test
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
The comparison of efficacy between the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block and adductor canal block with the infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) block versus Local infiltration of analgesia when combined with Continuous adductor canal block after Total knee arthroplasty: A randomized control trialOA Knee going on total knee arthroplasty-Anterior femoral cutaneous nerve blockAdductor canal blockinjection into the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) blockUltrasound-guidedLTCTR20191009006none70
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of two mouthrinses in reducing aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling.CTRI/2018/05/013935Amruta Joshi40
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
The effect of anesthetic gel (lidocaine and benzocaine) in reducing injection pain in childreIRCT20240616062152N1Islamic Azad University24
Recruiting
Phase 4
Effectiveness of Carfilzomib containing combination vs Bortezomib containing combination in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.Health Condition 1: C00-D49- NeoplasmsCTRI/2022/05/042759AIIMS Rishikesh
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of two methods of foot placement during Sit to stand activity on weight bearing symmetry in individuals with chronic strokeHealth Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecifiedCTRI/2019/08/020862Rutuja Arun Vaichal