跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06215560
NCT06215560已完成不适用

A Prospective Evaluation of Colorado's New Statutory PDMP Mandates: Compliance and Patient Outcomes

University of Colorado, Denver2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 89,871 人开始时间: 2025年1月9日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
89,871
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of PDMP check encounters

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this study is to test the impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve health care provider practices in line with state law requiring review of the Colorado prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) before prescribing an opioid analgesic (pain medications often called narcotics) or benzodiazepine (sedatives or muscle relaxants). The PDMP is a statewide database of filled controlled medication, allowing health care providers to review medications ordered by other health care providers in the state and identify high-risk factors for overdose.

The CDS tool only appears when a relevant prescription is being written by a health care provider and is purely informational, not dictating care or changes in treatment.

The study will track how the tool is used by health care providers, if an opioid or benzodiazepine prescription is signed, and future opioid use by patients.

详细描述

Improving prescription drug monitoring (PDMP) use and the safety of controlled medication prescribing is a pillar of the national response to the worsening opioid crisis. The evidence base for PDMPs would benefit greatly from research producing high quality, actionable data linking and measuring PDMP use and important patient outcomes. Data silos commonly limit the measurement of PDMP utilization and the linkage of PDMP use to provider prescribing actions. Best practice data linkage strategies can facilitate a robust evaluation of PDMP effectiveness and, specifically, the impact of Colorado's new PDMP regulations which mandate PDMP checks prior to opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions with certain exceptions.

The objective of this project is to improve data architecture across Colorado's largest hospital system to effectively measure clinician PDMP use to address gaps in data, compliance with statutes, and important outcomes associated with new PDMP regulations. By facilitating robust evaluations of process (e.g., PDMP use, opioid prescribing) and patient outcomes (e.g., future opioid use, co-prescribing, death), this data system will expedite the measurement of PDMP effectiveness on changing opioid prescribing. Further, evaluation of clinical decision support (CDS) to promote compliance with regulation can determine if mandates result in increased PDMP use, decreased opioid exposures, high-risk prescriptions, morbidity, and mortality. This project will enhance the PDMP in three key ways:

  • Address inefficiencies of collecting PDMP use data. Improved collection of PDMP data at the patient visit level will allow for rapid analysis of PDMP use and interventions.
  • Implement effective PDMP interventions. PDMP CDS tools can accelerate the uptake of mandated PDMP actions while routine data collection can be used to assess outcomes.
  • Address sustainability. Health system wide implementation will strengthen capacity to rapidly evaluate the effectiveness of multiple new PDMP policy interventions.

The proposed project will achieve this using a single system, pragmatic, cluster randomized trial of CDS to deliver new state mandated PDMP regulations compared to usual care to evaluate: PDMP use, regulatory compliance, and associated patient outcomes. This will be performed across the UCHealth system in collaboration with Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) to maximize the quality and impact of the work and generate novel, generalizable knowledge to support the progress of PDMPs.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
12 Years 至 89 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Health care providers:
  • 1. Health care providers licensed to prescribe opioids, employed at UCHealth Emergency department, ambulatory care practices or inpatient settings within the UCHealth system.
  • Patient encounters:
  • Patients seen in the UCHealth Emergency Department, outpatient clinic/office or inpatient setting during the intervention period
  • Provider initiates a prescription for an opioid or benzodiazepine
  • patient is between 12-89 years of age, inclusive

排除标准

  • Health care providers:
  • Providers primarily practicing in dentistry, veterinary medicine, oncology, pediatrics, palliative, or hospice practices.
  • Providers in ambulatory practices (primary care and specialty clinics) which write a total of less than 52 opioids and benzodiazepine prescriptions in the year prior to study initiation.
  • Patient encounters:
  • Encounters in dentistry, veterinary medicine, oncology practices, pediatrics practices, palliative care or hospice practices
  • Prisoners or wards of the state
  • Age <12 or >89 YOA
  • Active diagnosis of sickle cell, cancer, or in hospice care.

研究组 & 干预措施

Usual Care

Control group to enable tracking of temporal changes in prescribing. Providers will not see any alert.

CDS Alert

Providers will see a pop-up alert within the electronic health record (EHR) when they initiate an opioid or benzodiazepine prescription without recording use of the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) database.

Alerts do not appear with patients with oncology or sickle cell diagnoses, or hospice discharge orders.

干预措施: PDMP Check CDS (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of PDMP check encounters

时间窗: 18 months

The number of encounters where the state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) database is reviewed by a provider before signing an opioid or benzodiazepine prescription.

Initiated controlled medication prescription

时间窗: 18 months

The number of encounters in the observation window where an opioid or benzodiazepine prescription is signed

次要结局

  • Number of high-risk opioid prescriptions(18 months)
  • Number of patients with long term opioid use(6 months after index visit)
  • Number of patients with aberrant opioid use(6 months after index visit)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验