Comparison of Intraosseous Versus Intravenous Access in Suspected/Confirmed COVID-19 Patient in Prehospital Setting
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Success rate of first intravascular access attempt
研究概览
简要总结
The current COVID-19 pandemic, this is especially since the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is thought to occur mainly through respiratory droplets generated by coughing and sneezing, by direct contact with contaminated surfaces and because in a large number of patients COVID-19 disease may be asymptomatic. As recommended by the CDC medical personnel should be equipped with full personal protective equipment (PPE) for AGP in contact with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 patient. Therefore, it is reasonable to search for the most effective methods of intravascular access in those conditions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
- •Adult ≥ 18 years old
- •Non-traumatic cause of cardiac arrest
排除标准
- •Existing do-not-attempt-resuscitation order
- •OHCA patients with contraindications to IO access or IV access
- •Patients with signs of obvious death, e.g. rigor mortis
结局指标
主要结局
Success rate of first intravascular access attempt
时间窗: 1 day
successful placement of intravascular device
次要结局
- complication rates(1 day)
- number of attempts to successful access(1 day)
- time to infusion(1 day)
- ROSC(1 day)
- time to successful access(1 day)
研究者
Lukasz Szarpak
Assoc Prof PhD
Lazarski University
