Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation. Part 1
- Conditions
- Non Obstructive Urinary RetentionOveractive Bladder
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Pelvic floor EMG
- Registration Number
- NCT03194425
- Lead Sponsor
- Universiteit Antwerpen
- Brief Summary
Retrospective case-control study.
A substantial number of patients do not respond favourably to sacral neurostimulation (SNS) although clinically, they appear to have the same lower urinary tract dysfunction characteristics as the ones with good responses. This may be due to methodological issues (lead position) or patient selection. The purpose of this study is to improve and standardize lead position, in order to increase the patient response to test stimulation and to SNS treatment, and to decrease adverse events.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Male or female aged ≥18 years and competent to provide consent
- Minimum 3 months of self-reported OAB symptoms or self-reported obstructive LUTS in addition to confirmed non-obstructive urinary retention on UDO
- Failed, or are not a candidate for more conservative treatment (i.e., pelvic floor training, biofeedback, behavioral modification, oral pharmacotherapy)
- Willing to discontinue OAB medications for 2 weeks prior to the implant and for the entire study period
- Able to thoroughly fill in all questionnaires, voiding diaries and office visits for device programming and clinical evaluations before the TLP, 3 weeks after TLP and 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after implantation of definitive IPG.
- Current of prior evidence of primary stress incontinence or mixed incontinence where the stress component overrides the urgency component
- Any neurological condition that may interfere with normal bladder function, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, clinically significant peripheral neuropathy, or spinal cord injury (e.g., paraplegia)
- Urinary tract mechanical obstruction including but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
- Treatment of bladder or pelvic floor dysfunction with botulinum toxin (Botox ®) or surgery in past 12 months
- Unable to toilet self and have and maintain good personal hygiene
- Unable to provide clear, thoughtful responses to questions and questionnaires
- Urinary tract, bladder or vaginal infection or inflammation
- Hematuria, and absence of an elaborate diagnostic work-up
- Severe or uncontrolled diabetes (A1C > 8, documented in the last 3 months) or diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
- Allergy to local anesthetic or adhesives
- Bleeding disorder or on an anticoagulant that cannot be stopped for 3 days before the implant
- Pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, given birth in the past 12 months, or female of child-bearing potential and not practicing a medically-approved method of birth control
- Skin lesions or compromised skin at the implant or stimulation site
- Use of investigational drug or device therapy or participation in any study involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function within past 4 weeks
- Passive implants (e.g., prostheses) are allowed, but no implanted metal should be at the Neurostimulator implant site
- Knowledge of planned MRIs, diathermy, or high output ultrasonic exposure
- Presence of a documented condition or abnormality that could compromise the safety of the patient
- Any psychiatric or personality disorder at the discretion of the study physician
- Interstitial cystitis or bladder pain syndrome as defined by the EAU guidelines
- Life expectancy of less than 1 year
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description OAB Pelvic floor EMG Patients with overactive bladder on sacral neuromodulation. NOUR Pelvic floor EMG Patients with non-obstructive urinary retention on sacral neuromodulation.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method EMG activity of pelvic floor muscles in OAB patients and NOUR patients already on SNM 1 day Latency and amplitude of pelvic floor measured by EMG probe
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Antwerp University Hospital
🇧🇪Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium