Clinical Evaluation of Four Aesthetic Restorations in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
- Conditions
- Noncarious Cervical Lesions
- Interventions
- Other: NexComp FlowOther: 3M Espe Bulk-fillOther: Clearfil Majesty EstheticOther: EQUIA Forte Fil
- Registration Number
- NCT04261140
- Lead Sponsor
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
To compare the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer, flowable composite, bulkfill composite and nanohybrid composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
- Detailed Description
One hundred fourty NCCLs were randomised into four groups according to a split-mouth design. Clinical evaluations will be performed after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- had at least four non-carious symmetrical cervical lesions,
- had permanent dentition and were older than 20 years old,
- had cervical margins in dentin
- periodontal disease
- pregnant or breastfeeding
- being under orthodontic therapy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description flowable composite NexComp Flow - bulkfill composite 3M Espe Bulk-fill - nanohybrid composite Clearfil Majesty Esthetic - High-viscosity glass ionomer EQUIA Forte Fil -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method evaluation of restoration on cervical lesions 6 months According to FDI criteria (aesthetic, biological and fuctional) score 1, clinically very good; score 2, clinically good; score 3, clinically sufficient; score 4, clinically unsatisfactory; score 5, clinically poor. Scores 1-3 show clinically acceptable restoration, while scores 4 and 5 indicate failure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Dentistry Faculty
🇹🇷Rize, Turkey