MedPath

A Study to Compare Chemotherapy Alone Versus Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab or Nivolumab and BMS-986205, Followed by Continued Therapy After Surgery With Nivolumab or Nivolumab and BMS-986205 in Participants With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03661320
Lead Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare nivolumab plus neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy, followed by post-surgery continuation of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy, with neoadjuvant GC chemotherapy alone in adult participants with previously untreated muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
855
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participant must be deemed eligible for Radial Cystectomy (RC) by his/her oncologist and/or urologist, and must agree to undergo Radial Cystectomy (RC) after completion of neoadjuvant therapy.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 or 1
Exclusion Criteria
  • Clinical evidence of positive lymph node(s) (LN) (≥ 10 mm in short axis) or metastatic bladder cancer
  • Prior systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or surgery for bladder cancer other than trans urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) or biopsies is also not permitted

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm B: Nivolumab + GC ChemotherapyNivolumab-
Arm B: Nivolumab + GC ChemotherapyCisplatin-
Arm A: Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GC) ChemotherapyCisplatin-
Arm A: Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GC) ChemotherapyGemcitabine-
Arm B: Nivolumab + GC ChemotherapyGemcitabine-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) rate, in all randomized participantsApproximately 43 months

Arm B vs. Arm A

Event-Free Survival (EFS), in all randomized participantsApproximately 36 months

Arm B vs. Arm A

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
EFS, descriptively in all concurrently randomized participantsApproximately 36 months

Arm C vs. Arm B and Arm A

OS, descriptively in all concurrently randomized participantsApproximately 60 months

Arm C vs. Arm B and Arm A

Overall Survival (OS) in all randomized participantsApproximately 60 months

Arm B vs. Arm A

Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) in participants who received at least one treatment doseApproximately 60 months
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in participants who received at least one treatment doseApproximately 60 months
Incidence of deaths in participants who received at least one treatment doseApproximately 60 months
Incidence of laboratory abnormalities in participants who received at least one treatment doseApproximately 60 months
pCR rate, descriptively in all concurrently randomized participantsApproximately 43 months

Arm C vs. Arm B and Arm A

Trial Locations

Locations (171)

Local Institution - 0022

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Local Institution - 0021

🇺🇸

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Local Institution - 0036

🇺🇸

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Local Institution - 0004

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Local Institution - 0144

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Local Institution - 0005

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Local Institution - 0006

🇺🇸

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Local Institution - 0181

🇺🇸

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Local Institution - 0009

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Scroll for more (161 remaining)
Local Institution - 0022
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.