NCT05255198
Completed
Not Applicable
Anterior Minimal Invasive Surgery Versus Antero-lateral Approach in Hip Joint Hemiarthroplasty
Rehabilitation Hospital Tobelbad0 sites83 target enrollmentMay 1, 2016
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty
- Sponsor
- Rehabilitation Hospital Tobelbad
- Enrollment
- 83
- Primary Endpoint
- Visual Analogue Scale
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Comparison between two minimally invasive approaches to the hip joint.
Detailed Description
Following parameters were compared: modified Barthel-Index, pain, complications, developing of heterotopic ossification.
Investigators
Renate Krassnig MD PhD
Consultant
Rehabilitation Hospital Tobelbad
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •Exclusion criteria represented acute local or systemic infection, open or pathological fractures, concomitant injuries of the ipsi- or contralateral leg and rheumatoid arthritis.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: one year after surgery
Pain score
Similar Trials
Unknown
Phase 4
Comparison Between Anterior and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip ArthroplastyCoxarthrosisNCT01578746Sorlandet Hospital HF120
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Total Hip ArthroplastyHip OsteoarthritisHip ArthropathyMinimal InvasiveAnterior ApproachTissue InjuryNCT04311125National and Kapodistrian University of Athens90
Completed
Not Applicable
Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip ArthroplastyTotal Hip ArthroplastyNCT00881998Rothman Institute Orthopaedics100
Unknown
Not Applicable
The Clinical Outcomes After Direct Anterior Approach and Microposterior Approach for Total Hip ArthroplastyTotal Hip ArthroplastyNCT03210844National Taiwan University Hospital141
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques for Total Hip ResurfacingArthritisAvascular NecrosisNCT00750984Zimmer Biomet49