Pilot Investigation of Behavioral Alternatives to Indoor Tanning
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Skin Cancer
- Sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Enrollment
- 74
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Effort of alternatives
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this research is to develop and test the feasibility of an intervention that stimulates uptake of healthy alternatives to tanning by providing free access to them for a limited time. Free access gives participants a low-risk opportunity to try something new that is consistent with their motivations. Free access also allows them to experience the reinforcing properties of the alternatives which could prime continued use after the free trial period. The objective of the present study is to determine the feasibility and short-term efficacy of providing free alternatives to indoor tanners in an effort to "nudge" them to switch from indoor tanning to healthy alternatives.
Detailed Description
Melanoma is the second most common cancer diagnosed in young women and is responsible for nearly 8,000 US deaths per year. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) increases risk for melanoma. The International Agency for Research on Cancer assigned indoor tanning (IT; use of tanning beds or booths), as a class 1 carcinogen joining arsenic, asbestos, and mustard gas. Unfortunately, interventions educating tanners about the risks have not been very effective. Many tanners are more motivated by the immediate consequences of tanning than the delayed consequence of possibly getting cancer. Research shows the primary motivation for indoor tanning is to improve physical appearance, but a secondary motivation is stress reduction. Behavioral economics theory suggests that the rate of a behavior depends on 1) the reinforcing value of that behavior relative to alternatives, 2) the cost of engaging in the behavior relative to alternatives, and 3) the availability of the behavior relative to alternatives. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether exposure to healthy alternatives changes the behavior of indoor tanners. The investigators will randomize tanners to conditions differing in physical appearance and stress reduction alternatives to determine whether they can get their motivational needs met in healthier ways.
Investigators
Sherry Pagoto
Associate Professor
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Ages 16-65
- •Report minimum of 10 indoor tanning visits in the last year with intentions to continue
Exclusion Criteria
- •Ages \<16 or \>65
- •Pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study period
- •Reporting less than 10 indoor tanning visits per year
- •No intention to continue indoor tanning
- •Using sunless tanning more than once in the last year and ever in the last 3 months
- •Physically limited to do yoga or dance classes
- •DHA allergy
- •Inability to consent
- •Prisoners
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Effort of alternatives
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Perceived effort of alternatives will be discussed in a focus group setting.
Retention
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
% sessions complete and total withdrawn from study
Satisfaction
Time Frame: up to 12 months
A measure of satisfaction will be assessed for each alternative visit on a scale of 1-10 immediately after each activity is completed. Visits occur between baseline and 12 months of participation. Timing of visits depend on which condition is assigned.
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: baseline
Total randomized and total screened out.
Secondary Outcomes
- abstinence(12-month follow-up)