跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04410029
NCT04410029已完成不适用

Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Early Pregnancy Loss: a Pilot RCT Study

University of Pennsylvania2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2020年7月29日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Decision Conflict Scale (DCS)

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to determine the effect of the Healthwise decision aid on shared decision making in women undergoing management of early pregnancy loss.

详细描述

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) or miscarriage is a common problem occurring in 15-20% of pregnancies. EPL can safely be managed surgically, medically, or expectantly; patient preferences, together with provider recommendations, should be used to guide treatment decisions. The three management options differ substantially experientially for patients. Previous literature has shown that patients have preferences for treatment and higher satisfaction when treated according to their preferences. Decision aids provide individualized information to help patients clarify their priorities and personal values. There is good evidence that decision aids compared to usual care resulted in greater knowledge, more realistic expectations, lower decisional conflict relating to feeling informed, more active decision making, less people remaining undecided, and greater effect agreement on value and choice. Despite this, there is limited research on the extent of decisional conflict experienced by women undergoing treatment for EPL, or the effect of decision aids on decisional conflict. Furthermore, only a few decision aid tools are publicly available for this indication. The Healthwise decision aid tool receives high scores by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Scale, and is readily available to patients within the clinical site's electronic medical record.

The investigators propose a pilot randomized control trial, enrolling 50 participants with EPL. The study will measure baseline decisional conflict, and randomize participants to counseling with or without the decision aid. The investigators intend to study the Decisional Conflict Scale at baseline and after counseling, knowledge scores, Decision Regret and the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9) after counseling. Study data can be used to inform future research and to identify patients with predictors for high decisional conflict. This study is the first step towards validation of a high-quality decision aid tool for patients undergoing EPL management. It will also be the first study to report on decisional conflict and regret in patients with early pregnancy loss.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • English speaking
  • Definitive diagnosis of early intrauterine pregnancy loss (including anembryonic pregnancy and missed abortion [ultrasound examination demonstrates fetal pole without cardiac activity measuring between 5.3 and 7mm or an abnormal growth pattern diagnostic of EPL])
  • 18 years or older
  • Willing and able to give informed consent

排除标准

  • Pregnancy of unknown anatomic location
  • Unable to read English
  • Prior options counseling with a Family Planning provider
  • Clinically unstable requiring emergent surgical management with uterine evacuation.

结局指标

主要结局

Decision Conflict Scale (DCS)

时间窗: Post-counseling (one day)

Low-literacy version of Decision Conflict Scale

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验