Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06783855
NCT06783855RecruitingNot Applicable

Outcomes of Uretheroileal Suspension Technique During Open Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Neobladder: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

Sohag University1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The continence rates at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure will be evaluated

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The suspension technique is reported as the puboprostatic ligaments that attach the prostate to the symphysis pubis. After the ligating the complex, including both the dorsal vein complex and the puboprostatic ligaments, this complex was sharply divided anteriorly from the prostate with a safe distance (1-2 mm), and the urethra is defined and divided. After removing the prostate, the ileal pouch is reconstructed by completely everting the mucosa and sutured outward with a running 4-0 absorbable suture around the edge. The neck of the neobladder was narrowed to ≈1 cm, for convenient passage of a 20 F catheter. Anastomotic sutures of 3-0 absorbable polyglactin were placed at the 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 12 o'clock positions

Detailed Description

The suspension technique is reported as the puboprostatic ligaments that attach the prostate to the symphysis pubis. After the ligating the complex, including both the dorsal vein complex and the puboprostatic ligaments, this complex was sharply divided anteriorly from the prostate with a safe distance (1-2 mm), and the urethra is defined and divided. After removing the prostate, the ileal pouch is reconstructed by completely everting the mucosa and sutured outward with a running 4-0 absorbable suture around the edge. The neck of the neobladder was narrowed to ≈1 cm, for convenient passage of a 20 F catheter. Anastomotic sutures of 3-0 absorbable polyglactin were placed at the 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 12 o'clock positions through the full thickness of the urethra, including the mucosa and muscularis of the neobladder neck, ensuring mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis. The sutures at the 1 and 11 o'clock positions were anchored to the ligated complex including both the dorsal vein complex and the puboprostatic ligaments, to suspend the poucho-urethral anastomosis (suspension technique). The difference between the suspension and no-suspension techniques is only the placing of two sutures into the ligated complex

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patient age >18 years.
  • •Muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC).
  • •Non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) fulfilling the following criteria:
  • •(recurrent disease that is unresponsive to other treatments
  • •high-grade tumors (T1, carcinoma in situ) refractory to intravesical therapy
  • •Multifocal or recurrent high-grade tumors despite intravesical therapy and the tumor progression from NMIBC to MIBC).

Exclusion Criteria

  • •NMIBC or benign disease.
  • •Severe hepatic renal dysfunction.
  • •Urethral involvement with bladder carcinoma.
  • •Poor overall health status.
  • •Severe renal dysfunction.

Arms & Interventions

: group (A) 30 patients will be treated with suspension uretheroileal technique

Active Comparator

Intervention: suspension uretheroileal technique (Procedure)

group (B) 30 patients will be treated with conventional radical cystectomy and ileal neobladder

Active Comparator

Intervention: conventional radical cystectomy and ileal neobladder (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The continence rates at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure will be evaluated

Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure will be evaluated

Urinary continence after urethroileal suspension technique

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Abdelrahman Mohamed Abdellah

assistant lecturer urology department sohag university hospital

Sohag University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials