Comparing different types of Pediatric crowns for primary molar teeth: Stainless Steel, Bioflx, and Zirconia.
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/08/072111
- Lead Sponsor
- none
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Children with atleast one primary molar having signs of irreversible pulpitis indicated for pulpectomy.
2.Children with atleast one primary molar having either abscess, sinus tract or periapical pathology indicated for pulpectomy.
3.Children with primary molar having atleast 2/3rd of its root length.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Children with any Special Health Care needs or systemic disease.
2.Children with primary molar having developmental anomalies such as amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta, etc.
3.Children with primary molars having less than 2/3rd of its root length.
4.Children with non-restorable primary molars.
5.Children with parafunctional oral habits.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Satisfactory clinical and radiographic performance of preformed Stainless steel crowns in primary molars. <br/ ><br>2.Satisfactory clinical and radiographic performance of preformed Bioflx crowns in primary molars. <br/ ><br>3.Satisfactory clinical and radiographic performance of preformed Zirconia crowns in primary molars.Timepoint: baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Preformed Bioflx crowns show comparable clinical and radiographic performance as Stainless steel and Zirconia crowns in primary molars.Timepoint: baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3)