CTRI/2022/01/039128尚未招募3 期
A Multi-centric, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy ClinicalTrial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tapentadol Nasal Spray in Comparison toTramadol in Patients With Acute Moderate to Severe Pain - Tape NS
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Acute pancreatitis:
- •2. Male or female subjects of 18-65 years of age, both inclusive.
- •3. Patient willing to give written informed consent to participate in the study
- •Patient diagnosed with acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta Classification
- •2012 i.e., acute pancreatitis established by two of the following three criteria: (1)
- •abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis; (2) serum lipase activity (or amylase
- •activity) at least three times greater than the upper limit of normal; and (3)
- •characteristic findings of acute pancreatitis on imaging. If the diagnosis of acute
- •pancreatitis is established by abdominal pain and by increases in the serum pancreatic
- •enzyme activities, imaging is not mandatory to establish the diagnosis in the emergency
- •room or on admission to the hospital.
- •5. Patient complaining of abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis for duration
- •not more than 24 hours.
- •6. Patient having NPRS>=5 on an 11-point (0 to 10) Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS),
- •even after administration of acetaminophen or NSAID.
- •7. Patient requiring treatment with opioid analgesic in the opinion of Investigator
- •1. Male or female subjects of 18-65 years of age, both inclusive.
- •2. Patient willing to give written informed consent to participate in the study.
- •3. Low back pain, localized below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds.
- •4. Patients diagnosed with episode of nonspecific acute lumbago since not more than 2
- •days prior to inclusion in the trial and more than 6 weeks after the last episode of acute
- •low back pain.
- •5. Patient having NPRS>=5 on an 11-point (0 to 10) Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS),
- •even after administration of acetaminophen or NSAID.
- •6. Patient requiring treatment with opioid analgesic in the opinion of Investigator.
- •1. Male or female subjects of 18-65 years of age, both inclusive.
- •2. Patient willing to give written informed consent to participate in the study.
- •3. Patient with clinical diagnosis for a musculoskeletal trauma due to traumatic injury of
- •musculoskeletal structure of limbs like fractures, sprain, tendon rupture.
- •4. Patient has chief complaint of musculoskeletal pain lasting not more than 2 days prior
- •to inclusion in the trial.
- •5. Patient having NPRS>=5 on an 11-point (0 to 10) Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS),
- •even after administration of acetaminophen or NSAID.
- •6. Patient requiring treatment with opioid analgesic in the opinion of Investigator
排除标准
- •1.Patients with history of hypersensitivity to tapentadol, tramadol or any of the
- •excipients.
- •History of active or suspected gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding or motility disorder
- •within the past 6 months prior to screening.
- •Note: Investigator based on clinical judgement may initiate treatment without waiting
- •for confirmatory lab reports; however, if the patient is confirmed for meeting any
- •exclusion criteria based on laboratory results, patient would be withdrawn from study
- •and will be replaced with another eligible patient
- •3. Patients who have taken any medication by intranasal route within the past 72 hours
- •prior to randomization.
- •4. Patients with chronic use of any opioids for any disease within the last 28 days prior to
- •5. Patients currently being treated with tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin
- •reuptake inhibitors, selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, anticonvulsants,
- •neuroleptics, triptans, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, steroids or other drugs that have
- •the potential to reduce the seizure threshold within the past 4 weeks prior to screening.
- •6. History of any seizure disorder or epilepsy. Patients with increased intracranial
- •pressure, brain tumors, head injury, or impaired consciousness.
- •7. Patients with clinically significant ECG abnormalities.
- •8. Any clinically significant abnormal nasal or respiratory tract conditions i.e., atrophic
- •rhinitis, nasal polyp, upper respiratory tract infection etc. which can interfere with the
- •absorption of the drug.
- •9. History of drug abuse or known active alcohol abuse within the past 6 months.
- •10. Liver enzymes (alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase) >
- •2.5X the upper limit of normal value (ULN) or total bilirubin >1.5X of ULN or serum
- •creatinine >1.5X of ULN, and considered clinically significant by Investigator.
- •Patients having respiratory rate less than 12 breaths per minute or greater than 20
- •breaths per minute at randomization.
- •12. History of active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C or HIV infection.
- •13. Pregnant or lactating women or females of childbearing potential, who are neither
- •surgically sterilized nor willing to use reliable contraceptive methods throughout the
- •study duration or male subjects of childbearing potential not willing to use reliable
- •contraception methods throughout the study duration.
- •14. In the opinion of the Investigator, patient is either unable to cooperate or unlikely to
- •adhere with any study procedures.
- •15. Patients who have participated in any other investigational drug trial within the past
- •four weeks prior to screening.
- •16. Evidence of obstructive pancreatitis on available cross-sectional imaging.
- •17. Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
- •18. Patient requiring urgent surgery within 6 days of randomization.
- •19. Patient with evidence of chronic pancreatitis (recurrent, obstructive and chronic;
- •autoimmune and chronic; marked pancreatic insufficiency such as steatorrhea).
- •20. Suspected organ failure or progressing towards organ failure in the opinion of the
- •Investigator.
- •21.History of chronic low back pain.
- •22.Evidence of clinically unstable
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
3 期
ung cancer clinical study comparing efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of CBT124 (Bevacizumab Candidate Biosimilar) with EU-sourced Avastin®.CTRI/2017/02/007805Cipla BioTec Pvt Ltd200
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A study of FKS518 compared to Prolia in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (LUMIADE-3 Study)EUCTR2020-004422-31-HUFresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH556
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A study of FKS518 compared to Prolia in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (LUMIADE-3 Study)Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal WomenMedDRA version: 20.0Level: HLTClassification code 10005992Term: Bone metabolism disordersSystem Organ Class: 100000004861EUCTR2020-004422-31-EEFresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH556
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A study of FKS518 compared to Prolia in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (LUMIADE-3 Study)EUCTR2020-004422-31-BGFresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH556
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A study of FKS518 compared to Prolia in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (LUMIADE-3 Study)EUCTR2020-004422-31-CZFresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH556
