Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05912491
NCT05912491
Completed
N/A

Static and Functional Transperineal Ultrasonography for Identification of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Jagiellonian University0 sites71 target enrollmentJuly 1, 2012

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Sponsor
Jagiellonian University
Enrollment
71
Primary Endpoint
Mean urethral diameter
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI) are common female disorders. Accurate diagnosis of the aetiology of pelvic organ descent and prolapse with or without accompanying urination disorders is essential for appropriate therapeutic management. Imaging and functional urodynamic testing are being increasingly used in the diagnosis of this pathology, because precise assessment of the damage to the supporting and ligament apparatus is essential for therapeutic success. Pelvic floor ultrasound can facilitate dynamic assessment of static changes that occur during functional tests. Such assessments can provide additional insights into existing defects, which have explorative value and allow for targeted correction of damage, and may thus indirectly contribute to reduced rates of revision surgeries.

Detailed Description

Application of the ultrasound transducer to the patient's perineum can visualise three female pelvic compartments, and the images can be frozen to assess the positions of anatomical structures in relation to the pelvic bones and the pre-set planes as well as measure their mutual distances and predefined angles. The aim of the study was to assess the utility of ultrasound in the detection of UI, particularly for establishing the most useful anatomical and functional parameters and to propose cut-off points for ultrasonographic parameters. The presence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) requiring surgical management was the inclusion criterion. All patients underwent transperineal ultrasound (TPU) with a Voluson E6 (GE Medical systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The probe was oriented to coaxially visualise the pubic symphysis on one side and the anus and rectum on the other side of the 2D image. When all three compartments could not be visualised in one image, one image showing the anterior and medial compartments and another image showing the medial and posterior compartments were obtained instead. Next, 3D/4D ultrasound was performed to obtain an image in the coronal plane at the level of the arms of the levator ani muscle, showing the pubic symphysis and the anus. All measurements were performed in three states: during pelvic muscle relaxation, during Valsalva manoeuvre, and during perineal squeezing. The following quantitative parameters were assessed and compared across two arms of the study (with and without SUI): * Bladder-symphysis distance (BSD) - measured as the distance between the urine bladder neck and the symphysis, * Alpha angle - the angle between the axis of the proximal urethra and the x-axis of the symphysis pubis (central line), * Beta angle - the angle between the line parallel to the proximal urethra and the line parallel to the distal axis of urethra, * Gamma angle - the angle between the lower margin of the symphysis pubis and the urinary bladder neck), * Retrovesical angle (RVA) - the angle between the axis of the proximal urethra and the tangent line to the lowest part of the posterior wall of the urinary bladder, * Mean urethral diameter - the sum of the urethral diameters at three points (proximal, central, and distal parts) divided by 3.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1, 2012
End Date
May 30, 2023
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
Female

Investigators

Sponsor
Jagiellonian University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Iwona Magdalena Gawron

M.D., PhD., Principal Investigator

Jagiellonian University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence

Exclusion Criteria

  • Failure to obtain endpoint measurements due to lack of cooperation during the ultrasound examination
  • Prior surgery for either UI or POP
  • Pelvic tumours
  • Lack of consent to participate in the study

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean urethral diameter

Time Frame: 36 months

Mean urethral diameter in mm obtained by summing the urethral diameters at three points (proximal, mid, and distal) and dividing the sum obtained by 3

Beta angle

Time Frame: 36 months

Measurement of the angle in degrees between the line parallel to the proximal urethra and the line parallel to the distal axis of urethra

Bladder-symphysis distance (BSD)

Time Frame: 36 months

Distance in mm between the urine bladder neck and the symphysis

Gamma angle

Time Frame: 36 months

Measurement of the angle in degrees between the lower margin of the symphysis pubis and the urinary bladder neck

Alpha angle

Time Frame: 36 months

Measurement of the angle in degrees between the axis of the proximal urethra and the x-axis of the symphysis pubis (central line)

Retrovesical angle (RVA)

Time Frame: 36 months

Measurement of the angle in degrees between the axis of the proximal urethra and the tangent line to the lowest part of the posterior wall of the urinary bladder

Similar Trials