Orthophonic and / or Proprioceptive Treatment of Developmental Dyslexia.

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Developmental Dyslexia

• Registration Number: NCT03448237
• Lead Sponsor: Scalab CNRS 9193

Brief Summary

To show the interest of the association of proprioceptive and orthophonic care of dyslexic children. The assumption is that proprioceptive support by correcting a centrally located spatial localization instability restores the ability to automate.

It allows a gain of effectiveness of the orthophonic remediation of the reading of dyslexic children.

Interventional comparative study over 9 months, of three modes of care: Speech-language, or proprioceptive, or combined (speech therapy or proprioceptive)

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2018-02-15
• Study Start: 2018-02-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2018-02-21
• Study First Posted: 2018-02-28
• Primary Completion: 2019-10-05
• Status Verified: 2020-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-03-16
• Last Update Posted: 2020-03-17
• Study Completion: 2020-10-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 26

Inclusion Criteria

• Developmental dyslexia, (CIM-10)
• Having benefited from 2 years of speech therapy.
• Pathological reading delay of more than 24 months or -2 standard deviations.
• Either in the course of orthophonic care, or having stopped any orthophonic care.

Exclusion Criteria

• Refractive correction above +/- 1.5 diopters.
• Absence of binocular vision.
• Amblyopia.
• Convulsion.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change from baseline C index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Number of correctly read words (standard deviation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change from baseline TL index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Reading time in second (TL) (standard deviation)
Change from baseline E index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Number of errors (E)(standard deviation)
Change from baseline M index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Number of words read (M)(standard deviation)
Change from baseline CM index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Precision index (CM)(standard deviation)
Change from baseline CTL index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Speed index (CTL)(standard deviation)
Change from baseline Irregular ODEDYS test at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Irregular words reading (standard deviation)
Change from baseline Regular ODEDYS test at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Regular words reading, Screening tools for dyslexia (ODEDYS)(standard deviation)
change from baseline Pseudo-words ODEDYS test at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Pseudo-words reading (standard deviation)
Change from base line DFF VOG at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Duration of first fixation (DFF), of the measured reading in Video Oculography (VOG),
Change from baseline DL VOG at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Duration of look (DL), of the measured reading in Video Oculography (VOG),
Change from baseline TFT VOG at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	Total fixation time (TFT), of the measured reading in Video Oculography (VOG),
Observation of the evolution of the shape of maxwells spots from baseline at 9 months	Baseline, at nine months	From the shape of Maxwell's tasks to the fovea-scope
Vertical orthophoria	Baseline, at nine months	Comparison of the evolution of reading tests, taking into account the presence or absence of localization instability, whatever the treatment groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Scalab CNRS 9193; 🇫🇷 Villeneuve-d'Ascq, Haut De France, France