MedPath

Orthophonic and / or Proprioceptive Treatment of Developmental Dyslexia.

Not Applicable
Conditions
Developmental Dyslexia
Interventions
Other: Speech Therapy
Other: Proprioceptive treatment
Registration Number
NCT03448237
Lead Sponsor
Scalab CNRS 9193
Brief Summary

To show the interest of the association of proprioceptive and orthophonic care of dyslexic children. The assumption is that proprioceptive support by correcting a centrally located spatial localization instability restores the ability to automate.

It allows a gain of effectiveness of the orthophonic remediation of the reading of dyslexic children.

Interventional comparative study over 9 months, of three modes of care: Speech-language, or proprioceptive, or combined (speech therapy or proprioceptive)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
26
Inclusion Criteria
  • Developmental dyslexia, (CIM-10)
  • Having benefited from 2 years of speech therapy.
  • Pathological reading delay of more than 24 months or -2 standard deviations.
  • Either in the course of orthophonic care, or having stopped any orthophonic care.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Refractive correction above +/- 1.5 diopters.
  • Absence of binocular vision.
  • Amblyopia.
  • Convulsion.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Speech therapySpeech TherapySpeech therapy adapted to the child,
Combined TreatmentSpeech TherapyAssociation of speech therapy and proprioceptive treatment, adapted to the child.
Combined TreatmentProprioceptive treatmentAssociation of speech therapy and proprioceptive treatment, adapted to the child.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline C index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Number of correctly read words (standard deviation)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline TL index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Reading time in second (TL) (standard deviation)

Change from baseline E index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Number of errors (E)(standard deviation)

Change from baseline M index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Number of words read (M)(standard deviation)

Change from baseline CM index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Precision index (CM)(standard deviation)

Change from baseline CTL index ( Alouatte-R test) at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Speed index (CTL)(standard deviation)

Change from baseline Irregular ODEDYS test at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Irregular words reading (standard deviation)

Change from baseline Regular ODEDYS test at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Regular words reading, Screening tools for dyslexia (ODEDYS)(standard deviation)

change from baseline Pseudo-words ODEDYS test at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Pseudo-words reading (standard deviation)

Change from base line DFF VOG at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Duration of first fixation (DFF), of the measured reading in Video Oculography (VOG),

Change from baseline DL VOG at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Duration of look (DL), of the measured reading in Video Oculography (VOG),

Change from baseline TFT VOG at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

Total fixation time (TFT), of the measured reading in Video Oculography (VOG),

Observation of the evolution of the shape of maxwells spots from baseline at 9 monthsBaseline, at nine months

From the shape of Maxwell's tasks to the fovea-scope

Vertical orthophoriaBaseline, at nine months

Comparison of the evolution of reading tests, taking into account the presence or absence of localization instability, whatever the treatment groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Scalab CNRS 9193

🇫🇷

Villeneuve-d'Ascq, Haut De France, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath