Comparison of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and routine impression method for extraoral defects using a computer software
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signsHealth Condition 2: R688- Other general symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/08/044524
- Lead Sponsor
- Institutional funding Sharad pawar dental college and hospital DMIMS
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
�Defect size not bigger than 9 x 12 cm (3.5 x 4.5 inches)
�In the age group of 10 -70 years
�Extra oral defects
Exclusion Criteria
Patients who are not ready to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method This study would help in predicting the best method for craniomaxillofacial impression procedures. <br/ ><br>The final prosthesis will can be evaluated for precision, fit, accuracy, functional affectivity, time involved in comparison with conventional, photogrammetry and 3D scanning technology. The low-cost setup of photogrammetric method gives advantage of minimum chair side time and less patient exposure which is very much advantageous <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1 week
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time involved in comparison with conventional, photogrammetry and 3D scanning technology.Timepoint: 1 day