Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03790748
NCT03790748CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique for Adequate Anesthesia During Vaginal Surgeries

Cairo University2 sites in 1 country273 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
273
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
incidence of bilateral sacral blockade

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted on 273 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for elective vaginal surgeries such as vaginal hysterectomy, repair of prolapse Patients will be divided into three equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=91), group B for dural puncture epidural with 27G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=91) and group C for dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle(n=91). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelope.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •ASA I and II
  • •Height(150-170 cm)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •patient refusal
  • •hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs
  • •bleeding disorders and coagulopathy(platelets count less than 80000,INR less than 1.5 or therapeutic dose of anticoagulant).

Arms & Interventions

Conventional Epidural Technique

Experimental

Procedure: Standard Lumbar Epidural Block using Touhy Epidural Needle (18G) at L4-5 inter-space and Epidural Catheter (20G) was inserted then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Intervention: 25G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique (Procedure)

Conventional Epidural Technique

Experimental

Procedure: Standard Lumbar Epidural Block using Touhy Epidural Needle (18G) at L4-5 inter-space and Epidural Catheter (20G) was inserted then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Intervention: 27G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique (Procedure)

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle

Active Comparator

Procedure: 25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L4-5 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Intervention: 27G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique (Procedure)

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle

Active Comparator

Procedure: 25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L4-5 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Intervention: Standard Lumbar Epidural Technique (Procedure)

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 27G Whitacre needle

Active Comparator

Procedure: 27G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L4-5 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Intervention: Standard Lumbar Epidural Technique (Procedure)

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 27G Whitacre needle

Active Comparator

Procedure: 27G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L4-5 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.

Intervention: 25G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

incidence of bilateral sacral blockade

Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection

Sensory blockade was evaluated using a non-traumatic pinprick stimulus starting at the S2 dermatome and moving in a caudad direction (measured every 2 minutes)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of epidural top-ups(Number of extra doses of local anesthetic given after injection of local anesthetic loading dose till end of the surgery)
  • Sedation score(Assessed every 20 minutes during the surgical procedure and postoperatively)
  • Onset of sensory blockade(Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection)
  • Maximum achieved sensory level(Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection)
  • Time to achieve the maximum sensory level(Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection)
  • Onset of motor blockade(Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection)
  • Time to complete motor block(Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection)
  • Duration of motor block(Assessed every 20 minutes after achieving Bromage 3 motor block)
  • Duration of analgesia(Time for requirement for rescue analgesia or VAS pain score >3 as postoperatively)
  • Duration of sensory block(Assessed every 20 minutes after achieving highest dermatome level of sensory analgesia)
  • Hemodynamic parameters(Assessed every 5 minutes from the start of anesthetic procedures till transfer the patients to the rooms)
  • Perioperative side effects(During surgical period up to 7 days post-operatively)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Reham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman

Lecturer of Anesthesia

Cairo University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials