Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01962480
NCT01962480CompletedNot Applicable

The Clinical Effects of Intracorporally Closure of the Hernia Defect in Laparoscopic Umbilical or Epigastric Hernia Repair

Hvidovre University Hospital1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain at mobilisation from lying to sitting position measured with Visual Analogue Scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Introduction: Closure of the hernia gap in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair before mesh reinforcement has gained increasing acceptance among surgeons despite creating a tension-based repair. Beneficial effects of this technique have sporadically been reported but no evidence is available from randomized controlled trials.

The primary purpose is to compare early postoperative activity-related pain in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with closure of the gap with patients undergoing standard laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (non-closure of the gap). Secondary outcomes are cosmesis and hernia-related quality of life (QoL) at 30-days and clinical or radiological recurrence and chronic pain after 2 years.

Material and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded study is planned. Based on power calculation we will include 40 patients in each arm. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic umbilical, epigastric, or umbilical trocar-site hernia repair at Hvidovre Hospital, Herlev Hospital, or Køge Hospital, who meet the inclusion criteria, are invited to participate.

Conclusion: The technique with closure of the gap may induce more postoperative pain, but may be superior with regard to other important surgical outcomes. No studies have previously investigated closure of the gap in the setting of a randomised controlled trial.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Inclusion criteria
  • •Elective, primary or recurrent laparoscopic umbilical or epigastric hernia repair, umbilical trocar-site hernia and epigastric hernia repair where laparoscopic hernia repair is no contraindication (i.e. previous laparotomy with anticipated severe and dense adhesions
  • •Hernia defect between 2-6 cm measured preoperatively by the surgeon at the out-patient clinic
  • •Maximum 1 defect
  • •Patients 18-80 years Patients with technical failure (where it is not possible to suture the defect) or patients who are reoperated due to complications remain included and will stay in their primary assigned randomization group in order to perform an intention to treat (ITT) analysis.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Open hernia repair
  • •Poor compliance (language problems, dementia and alcohol or drug abuse etc.)
  • •Fascia defect >6 cm (largest diameter, evaluated preoperatively and intra-operatively, thus patients are excluded if the defect is found larger intra-operatively)
  • •Emergency repair
  • •Chronic pain syndrome (chronic back pain, chronic headache, severe dysmenorrhea, fibromyalgia, whiplash or other conditions requiring daily opioid medication)
  • •Daily consumption of opioids (for the last 3 weeks up till the operation)
  • •Decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B-C)
  • •If the hernia repair is secondarily to another surgical procedure
  • •If a patient withdraws his/her inclusion consent

Arms & Interventions

sutured closure of the hernia gap

Active Comparator

The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally

Intervention: The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally (Procedure)

No closure of the hernia gap

No Intervention

Physiomesh is placed with at least 5 cm overlap of the gap and fixated with double crown technique

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain at mobilisation from lying to sitting position measured with Visual Analogue Scale

Time Frame: 24 hrs postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cosmetic result measured with verbal rating scale and numeric rating scales(measured 30 days postoperatively)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mette Willaume Christoffersen

M.D, PhD

Hvidovre University Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

The Effect of Laparoscopically Closing the... | Clinical Trial