MedPath

Treatment of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in the Thighs Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Treatment of Adipose Tissue in the Thighs
Interventions
Device: Liposonix System (Model 2)
Registration Number
NCT01823653
Lead Sponsor
Solta Medical
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with the Liposonix System (Model 2) for the circumferential reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) of the thighs.

Detailed Description

Subjects received a single treatment (Liposonix System) on one randomly assigned thigh. The opposite thigh was not treated and served as a control for each subject.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or female subjects between 18-60 years of age
  • Body Mass Index of ≤30 lb/in2
  • Thickness of adipose tissue is at least 1.0 cm beyond the selected focal depth in the area to be treated (≥2.3cm)
  • Subjects must agree not to alter their regular diet or exercise routines during the course of the study
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all study visit requirements, procedures, and assessments
  • Subject must understand the nature of the study and sign an IRB approved Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects is pregnant
  • Subjects diagnosed with a coagulation disorder or receiving anticoagulant therapy
  • Subject has had prior aesthetic procedures in the area to be treated
  • Subjects has pacemaker, defibrillator, or other implantable electrical device
  • Subject has significant circumferential asymmetry between thighs

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Treated ThighLiposonix System (Model 2)Subjects randomly received treatment of either the left or right thigh with the Liposonix System (Model 2)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical Improvement in Thigh Circumference12 weeks (minus baseline)

Clinical improvement measured by change from baseline thigh circumference after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety Assessment1, 4, 8, 12 weeks

Discomfort level during treatment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and post-treatment skin reponses or side effects using a 0-3 severity scale.

Percentage of Participants Showing Clinical Improvement Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Post Treatment, Assessed by Investigator12 weeks

Investigator improvement at 12 weeks using the GAIS Scale, as presented based on percentage of subjects showing improvement. Outcome presented in % of participants that had GAIS scores of either 4 (improved) or 5 (much improved) at 12 weeks post treatment.

\*GAIS Scale: 1=Much Worse, 2=Worse, 3=No Improvement, 4=Improved, 5=Much Improved

Patient Satisfaction Using 1-5 Likert Scale12 weeks

Likert scale ranges from 1=Very Dissatisfied to 4=satisfied, 5=very satisfied. Percentage of participants rated 4 and 5 are reported below

Subcutaneous Adipose Thickness12 weeks

Ultrasound assisted measurement of adipose tissue thickness

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Score Post Treatment Assessed by Investigator for Determining Clinical Improvement12 weeks

Mean Investigator improvement at 12 weeks using the GAIS Scale.

\*GAIS Scale: 1=Much Worse, 2=Worse, 3=No Improvement, 4=Improved, 5=Much Improved

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Van Dyke Laser and Skin

🇺🇸

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Solta Medical Aesthetic Center

🇺🇸

Hayward, California, United States

Jewell Plastic Surgery Center

🇺🇸

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Solish M.D.

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath