Treatment of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in the Thighs Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
- Conditions
- Treatment of Adipose Tissue in the Thighs
- Interventions
- Device: Liposonix System (Model 2)
- Registration Number
- NCT01823653
- Lead Sponsor
- Solta Medical
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with the Liposonix System (Model 2) for the circumferential reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) of the thighs.
- Detailed Description
Subjects received a single treatment (Liposonix System) on one randomly assigned thigh. The opposite thigh was not treated and served as a control for each subject.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Male or female subjects between 18-60 years of age
- Body Mass Index of ≤30 lb/in2
- Thickness of adipose tissue is at least 1.0 cm beyond the selected focal depth in the area to be treated (≥2.3cm)
- Subjects must agree not to alter their regular diet or exercise routines during the course of the study
- Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all study visit requirements, procedures, and assessments
- Subject must understand the nature of the study and sign an IRB approved Informed Consent
- Subjects is pregnant
- Subjects diagnosed with a coagulation disorder or receiving anticoagulant therapy
- Subject has had prior aesthetic procedures in the area to be treated
- Subjects has pacemaker, defibrillator, or other implantable electrical device
- Subject has significant circumferential asymmetry between thighs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treated Thigh Liposonix System (Model 2) Subjects randomly received treatment of either the left or right thigh with the Liposonix System (Model 2)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Improvement in Thigh Circumference 12 weeks (minus baseline) Clinical improvement measured by change from baseline thigh circumference after treatment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safety Assessment 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks Discomfort level during treatment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and post-treatment skin reponses or side effects using a 0-3 severity scale.
Percentage of Participants Showing Clinical Improvement Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Post Treatment, Assessed by Investigator 12 weeks Investigator improvement at 12 weeks using the GAIS Scale, as presented based on percentage of subjects showing improvement. Outcome presented in % of participants that had GAIS scores of either 4 (improved) or 5 (much improved) at 12 weeks post treatment.
\*GAIS Scale: 1=Much Worse, 2=Worse, 3=No Improvement, 4=Improved, 5=Much ImprovedPatient Satisfaction Using 1-5 Likert Scale 12 weeks Likert scale ranges from 1=Very Dissatisfied to 4=satisfied, 5=very satisfied. Percentage of participants rated 4 and 5 are reported below
Subcutaneous Adipose Thickness 12 weeks Ultrasound assisted measurement of adipose tissue thickness
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Score Post Treatment Assessed by Investigator for Determining Clinical Improvement 12 weeks Mean Investigator improvement at 12 weeks using the GAIS Scale.
\*GAIS Scale: 1=Much Worse, 2=Worse, 3=No Improvement, 4=Improved, 5=Much Improved
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Van Dyke Laser and Skin
🇺🇸Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States
Solta Medical Aesthetic Center
🇺🇸Hayward, California, United States
Jewell Plastic Surgery Center
🇺🇸Eugene, Oregon, United States
Solish M.D.
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada