Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02041793
NCT02041793CompletedNot Applicable

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Endoscopic Drainage for Pseudocyst of the Pancreas

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi2 sites in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2010Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
60
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Resolution of Pseudocyst

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing Laparoscopic and endoscopic drainage for pseudocyst of the pancreas secondary to acute pancreatitis. The primary outcome measure will be resolution of the pseudocyst by the intended treatment within 4 weeks. The secondary outcomes will be complications, recurrence and cost analysis between the two methods.

Detailed Description

This study will be conducted in the Department of Surgical Disciplines and Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Patients with pancreatic pseudocyst will be randomized to two groups-

Group I- Laparoscopic management of the pseudocyst Group II- Endoscopic management of the pseudocyst

Patients will be randomized using computer generated randomized numbers in sealed envelopes to ensure concealed allocation with block randomization. The details of patients who do not meet inclusion criteria and those who refuse consent and reason for refusal of consent will also be noted. Refusal for consent for inclusion in the study will not hamper the treatment of these patients in anyway. The patients will be evaluated prospectively. CONSORT guidelines will be followed.

Preoperative Data

The details regarding demographic profile of the patient i.e. age/ sex/ body mass index (BMI) and clinical features will be noted. The duration and presenting complaint for pseudocyst and history regarding the acuteness of underlying pancreatic disease will be noted. The etiology of pancreatitis will be noted. Patients will be examined thoroughly and the characteristic features of the pseudocysts, the size and the site (head, body or tail of the pancreas) will be noted. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading of the patient will also be done.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
12 Years to 80 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Symptomatic patients with pseudocyst of size more than 6 cm, more than 6-8 weeks duration after an attack of acute pancreatitis.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with chronic pancreatitis associated pseudocyst.
  • Patients who have undergone any form of intervention previously
  • Patients with significant co-morbidities
  • Patients unfit for general anesthesia
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Patients refusing consent
  • Patients having significant necrotic debris not considered fit for endoscopic drainage. The presence of necrotic debris will be assessed by ultrasound of the abdomen and if required magnetic resonance imaging. The volume of the cyst and that of necrotic debris will be calculated and significant debris will be defined as >30% of debris volume/volume
  • Presence of a pseudoaneurysm

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Resolution of Pseudocyst

Time Frame: 4 weeks

resolution on imaging

Secondary Outcomes

  • Adverse Events(4 weeks)
  • Cost per patient(4 weeks)
  • Recurrence rate of pseudocyst(3 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Virinder Kumar Bansal

Additional Professor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials