Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT07303673
NCT07303673
Completed
Not Applicable

Coblation Assisted Dilatation Versus Modified Maddern Procedure in Subglottic and Cervical Tracheal Stenosis: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Mansoura University1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2024Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Airway diameter
OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

This study compares the effectiveness of Coblation-assisted endoscopic airway dilatation with the modified Maddern procedure-which involves endoscopic excision of scar tissue followed by buccal mucosal grafting-in patients with subglottic and/or upper tracheal stenosis.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •All consecutive patients with (grade II, III) subglottic and/or upper tracheal stenosis according to Myer-Cotton grading system
  • •all age groups (children and adults)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with cervical spine diseases where an extended position during the procedure could be problematic.
  • •Previous neck or oral cavity irradiation.
  • •chronic uncontrolled debilitating diseases that might interfere with the healing process e.g. (diabetes mellitus, renal failure, decompensated liver diseases).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Airway diameter

Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 weeks

assessment of the diameter of the airway after the procedure by endoscopic examination

Secondary Outcomes

  • subjective evaluation of breathing(3, 6, and 12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Not Applicable
Portable Endoscopic Camera System Using Modified Action Camera for Endoscopic Sinunasal Examination
NCT07289854University of Arkansas40
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) During SleepApnea Syndrome
NCT04474756University Hospital, Grenoble90
Completed
Not Applicable
Securing airway through two different supraglottic devices under general anaesthesia
CTRI/2019/03/018250S Nijalingappa Medical college60
Completed
Phase 4
Effectiveness of the New Perilaryngeal Airway in Comparison With the Laryngeal Mask AirwayObesity
NCT02439021Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences74
Completed
Not Applicable
Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl for insertion of ProSeal LMA.
CTRI/2017/09/009750Medica Superspecialty Hospital74