跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02601820
NCT02601820已完成不适用

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET (PROP UP)

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill11 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,601 人开始时间: 2015年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,601
试验地点
11
主要终点
Change in the Total Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Mean Score (TMSAS) From Baseline to On-Treatment

研究概览

简要总结

The PROP UP research study is funded by The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). PROP UP is a multi-centered prospective observational study that will evaluate all-oral treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection regarding several patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as HCV-associated symptoms, treatment side effects, medication adherence, out of pocket costs, comorbid conditions, and long-term benefits of cure and harms of treatment to compare PROs of different treatment regimens, treatment durations, and patient subgroups. Participants will be recruited from 9 U.S. liver centers. Approximately 1920 patients with HCV infection who are prescribed a regimen containing Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir(SOF/LED), SOF/Velpatasvir(SOF/VEL), Grazoprevir/Elbasvir(GRZ/ELB), OBV/PTV/r + DSV (PRoD), or daclatasvir/SOF (DAC/SOF) will be recruited and approximately 1600 patients who are approved and begin HCV treatment will be enrolled in the longitudinal study. PRO surveys will be evaluated before, during and after HCV treatment.

PROP UP is a collaborative effort between behavioral and biomedical researchers, a patient engagement group and a patient advocacy organization.

详细描述

Newer, more effective all-oral regimens for hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection are available. However the available data from industry-sponsored trials do not provide all the information that patients need, nor do these data represent the broad spectrum of patients treated in real-world practice. Trials also exclude disadvantaged subgroups, focus on short-term efficacy and clinician-rated adverse events, rarely obtain the patient's perspective, and do not investigate longer-term harms of treatment or benefits of viral cure. Given these informational gaps, patient-centered outcomes research on treatment harms and benefits that matter most to patients, is needed.

PROP UP is funded by The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). PROP UP is a multi-centered prospective observational study that will evaluate newly approved direct acting antiviral (DAA) treatment regimens for HCV regarding several patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as HCV-associated symptoms, treatment side effects, medication adherence, out of pocket costs, comorbid conditions, and long-term benefits of cure and harms of treatment to compare PROs of different treatment regimens, treatment durations, and patient subgroups.

PROP UP is a collaborative effort between researchers, a patient engagement group, and a patient advocacy organization. Eleven U.S. liver centers will collaborate on PROP UP. Approximately 1920 patients with HCV infection who are prescribed a DAA regimen for chronic HCV will be consented and will complete baseline PRO surveys. Approximately 1600 patients who are approved and begin HCV treatment will be enrolled in the longitudinal study. Participants will complete several PRO surveys at 5 assessment periods during the study: baseline, treatment week 4, end of treatment, 3 months post-treatment, and 12 months post-treatment. PRO survey data will be collected via 3 options: patient home-based computers, tablet, smartphone; phone-administered surveys with a centralized call enter; or at regular clinic visits.

Analysis of PROs collected longitudinally before, during and after treatment for HCV will allow the investigators to answer a variety of questions important to patients and clinicians. Specifically, the investigators will evaluate: (a) prevalence of pre-existing baseline symptoms associated with HCV; (b) the development of new onset treatment side effects and exacerbation of pre-existing symptoms during HCV treatment; (c) medication adherence and out of pocket costs associated with treatment; (d) changes in HCV-associated symptoms and functional status in patients who are cured; (e) long-term patient-reported harms associated with treatments and long-term benefits associated with viral cure.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosed with HCV genotype 1-6
  • English-speaking
  • Age 21 or older
  • Medically cleared and being prescribed one of the following DAA regimens:
  • sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LED) with or without ribavirin
  • ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir with dasabuvir (PRoD), with or without ribavirin
  • elbasvir/grazoprevir (ELB/GRZ) with or without ribavirin
  • daclatasvir/sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin (DAC/SOF)
  • sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL)

排除标准

  • Inability to provide written informed consent
  • Currently participating in a pharmaceutical-sponsored drug trial of hepatitis C treatment
  • Major cognitive or mental impairment
  • Unable to read or speak English
  • Unwilling or unable to complete survey questionnaires

结局指标

主要结局

Change in the Total Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Mean Score (TMSAS) From Baseline to On-Treatment

时间窗: Baseline to up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment

Change in "Overall Symptom Burden" was measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). Patients indicate the presence or absence of a symptom, and if present, rate the symptom on severity, frequency and interference. The total MSAS score (TMSAS) can range from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (symptom present and worst severity, frequency and distress). Change in TMSAS score is calculated as Baseline TMSAS mean score minus T2 TMSAS mean score or Baseline TMSAS mean score minus T3 TMSAS mean score. Change scores could range from +/- 4.0. Higher scores (+) indicate worse symptom burden. To aid in interpretation of clinically significant change, a \>5% change from baseline was set as the "minimally important change (MIC)" threshold. A 5% change in the TMSAS = 0.3 points; therefore TMSAS change scores \> +/- 0.3 were considered clinically meaningful.

次要结局

  • Change in HCV-PRO Mean Scores From Baseline to On-Treatment(Baseline to up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment)
  • Change in Total Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (TMSAS) Mean Score From Baseline to 3-months Post Treatment(Baseline to 3-months post-treatment)
  • Change in Treatment-Related Symptom Mean Scores From Baseline to On-Treatment(Baseline to up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment)
  • Cumulative Out of Pocket Costs During HCV Treatment(Up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment)
  • Percentage of Participants With Nonadherence During HCV Treatment(Up to 24 weeks of HCV Treatment)
  • Change in HCV Symptom Mean Scores From Baseline to 3-months Post Treatment(Baseline to 3-months post-treatment)
  • Change in Total Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (TMSAS) Mean Score From Baseline to 1 Year Post-Treatment(Baseline to 1 year post-treatment)
  • Changes in HCV Symptom Mean Scores From Baseline to 1 Year Post-Treatment(Baseline to 1 year post-treatment)
  • Change in HCV-PRO Mean Score From Baseline to 3-months Post Treatment(Baseline to 3-months post-treatment)
  • Change in HCV-PRO Mean Score From Baseline to 1 Year Post-treatment(Baseline to 1 year post-treatment)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (11)

Loading locations...

相似试验

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET | 临床试验