跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05500001
NCT05500001招募中不适用

Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study

University of Alberta8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 113 人开始时间: 2022年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
113
试验地点
8
主要终点
Family Burden Interview Schedule

研究概览

简要总结

Background: A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Although family support groups exist, few groups offer evidence-based, skills-focused, psychoeducation taught by certified professionals and provided on a public-health level. By equipping families with skills and knowledge, public healthcare harnesses a powerful ally to maintain community stabilization.

Aims: The primary study goal is to implement a psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting young adults with psychosis to reduce family burden and foster community stabilization of service users.

Methods: A longitudinal pre-post design will be used to assess the long-term effectiveness of the psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting a young adult with psychosis on service utilization and functional indexes. Nine expert-reviewed, and family peer-informed psychoeducation modules are administered in 2-hour sessions over 9 weeks to family carers.

Conclusion: Presenting the novel approach of an expert-reviewed, peer-informed psychoeducation intervention for family carers, with a focus on knowledge and skill development, the researchers contribute to literature and best practice in patient and family-centered care.

详细描述

Background:

A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Often family carers are excluded from the discharge planning process or are unaware of how to support of their loved one in community. Although best practice documents champion family involvement the implementation of these guidelines is challenge and families are often excluded from care.There is evidence of the disparity between best practice documents and true practice in the literature.

Family inclusion also addresses the impact of psychotic disease on the family's functioning and mental health. Psychotic illness (e.g., anosognosia, paranoia) can interfere with relational health and the natural maturation of family relationships over time. Families face extreme challenges when supporting a young adult with psychotic illness including social isolation, likely because their typical social supports are unable to relate to their situation, prompting them to seek support with those who share their situation (i.e., family support groups). Family carers, even in the face of these hardships, work with great tenacity toward improving service user stability in community.

There is a lack of high-quality effectiveness research showing longitudinal evidence for treatment effects on the carer and the young person in family psychoeducation groups. For example, one study provided a family intervention that was primarily knowledge- and support-based. These researchers used a pre-post design to assess the mental health knowledge, but did not assess long-term effectiveness of the group, overall family functioning, and functioning of the service user.

The intent for this longitudinal pre-post study is to evaluate the effect of skills-based educational programming for family carers supporting young adults admitted to or discharged from hospital with psychosis of any etiology on 6-month and 24-month service user readmission rates and service user/family functional indexes. The investigators hypothesize that system integration of a program which delivers early support for the family carers by way of an educational intervention beginning prior to or shortly after hospital discharge may reduce family burden as well as improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. To the investigators' knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate effectiveness of a family carer skills-based education intervention within a public healthcare system.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
17 Years 至 27 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Young adult service user is aged 17-27 at time of recruitment
  • Young adult service user has had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months

排除标准

  • Not proficient in English
  • Young adult service user has NOT had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months

结局指标

主要结局

Family Burden Interview Schedule

时间窗: 24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)

assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health

Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule

时间窗: 24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)

assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)

Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life

时间窗: 24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)

assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.

次要结局

  • Crisis Service Frequency(12-24 months post-intervention)
  • Community Appointment Frequency(12-24 months post-intervention)
  • Inpatient Readmission Rate(12-months post-intervention)
  • Inpatient Admission Frequency(12-24 months post-intervention)
  • Emergency Department Visit Frequency(12-24 months post-intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验