跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01152320
NCT01152320已完成不适用

Randomized Controlled Trial of Spirometry Fundamentals™ in the Primary Care Setting

University of Washington1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 52 人开始时间: 2007年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
52
试验地点
1
主要终点
Spirometry test quality

研究概览

简要总结

Spirometry is a recommended component of asthma diagnosis and treatment in the primary care setting, yet few primary care providers report routine use of spirometry in the provision of care for their asthma patients. Misclassification of asthma severity has been reported when assessment is based on symptoms alone. This misclassification can lead to inadequate treatment that may result in increased morbidity and increased healthcare utilization/cost. However, even when spirometry is utilized to aid in asthma severity classification, primary care providers have a high rate of failing to meet the quality goals for testing established by the American Thoracic Society.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Spirometry Fundamentals™ tool in training primary care providers and their staff in producing high-quality flow-volume curves as compared to existing training modalities and to gather information in a 'real-world' setting that can be used to improve Spirometry Fundamentals™.

详细描述

Currently few self-paced, distance learning programs exist that train staff to perform good quality spirometry tests. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a distance-learning tool for training primary care providers and their medical assistants in the use of spirometry to assist in managing obstructive lung disease (asthma and COPD). This tool is called "Spirometry Fundamentals™: A basic guide to lung function testing". It is a computer-based training program that teaches primary care providers and their staff what spirometry is, how it can be used, the techniques required to perform high-quality spirometry, and clinical interpretation of the spirometric data.

We evaluated the effectiveness of Spirometry Fundamentals in the primary care setting by conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Study participants were primary care physicians (MDs or DOs) and their staff (medical assistants (MAs) or nurses (RNs)) and were recruited as study pairs. The role of the MDs was to utilize spirometry in clinical care by ordering spirometry tests based on their clinical judgment, and the role of the MAs was to perform the spirometry. The patients performed the spirometry as part of their usual care were not considered study subjects.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Subjects must have internet access in order to transmit spirometry curve and survey data.
  • •Subjects must have access to a computer with Windows 2000 /Mac OS 10 or higher in order to view Spirometry Fundamentals™.
  • •Subjects must have access to a ndd Easyone spirometer.

排除标准

  • •Subjects who lack internet access which will be needed to transmit study data
  • •Subjects who lack access to a computer with Windows 2000 /Mac OS 10 or higher which will be needed to view Spirometry Fundamentals™.
  • •Subjects who lack access to a ndd Easyone spirometer.

研究组 & 干预措施

Standard of Care

No Intervention

Intervention

Experimental

Spirometry Fundamentals™ CD training program

干预措施: Spirometry Fundamentals™ Training CD (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Spirometry test quality

时间窗: Four months for controls; six months for intervention sites

Percentage of acceptable quality spirometry tests as determined by standards set by the American Thoracic Society.

次要结局

  • Effect of frequency of spirometry use on primary outcome(Four months for controls; six months for intervention sites)
  • Effect of practice location on primary outcome(Four months for controls; six months for intervention sites)
  • Effect of practice type on primary outcome(Four months for controls; six months for intervention sites)
  • Effect of practice structure on primary outcome(Four months for controls; six months for intervention sites)
  • Effect of months of spirometry use on primary outcome(Four months for controls; six months for intervention sites)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验