MedPath

Low-Level Laser in Head and Neck Chronic Lymphedema

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Head and Neck Cancer
Fibrosis
Lymphedema
Interventions
Device: Low-level laser
Registration Number
NCT04482855
Lead Sponsor
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) on the severity of lymphedema, symptom burden, functional status, and quality of life in HNC survivors.

Detailed Description

Primary aim: To determine the impact of LLLT, as compared to wait-list control, on changes in severity of lymphedema.

Secondary aim: To determine the impact of LLLT, as compared to a wait-list control, on lymphedema-related symptom burden (e.g., tightness), functional impairments (e.g., range of motion in jaw and neck), and quality of life.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • >18 years of age
  • >6 months post HNC treatment
  • No evidence of cancer confirmed with imaging tests
  • Having head and neck lymphedema with or without fibrosis
  • Completion of initial lymphedema therapy
  • Lymphedema duration between 3-24 months
  • Ability to speak and read English
  • Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded if they have any of the following medical conditions that would prohibit the safe implementation of LLLT:

  • Pregnancy
  • Acute infection
  • Photosensitivity
  • Chronic inflammatory diseases
  • Venous thrombosis
  • Carotid artery stenosis
  • History of severe trauma
  • Medication that affects body fluid and electrolyte balance
  • Use of high doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Pre-existing skin rash, ulceration, open wound in the treatment area
  • Active lymphedema therapy or physical therapy
  • Allergic and other systemic skin diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 1 (laser group)Low-level laserGroup 1 (laser group): After completion of the baseline measurements, Group 1 participants will be scheduled for LLLT. After completion of LLLT, participants will be scheduled for the 4-week and 8-week follow up data collection.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total Severity of External Lymphedema and Fibrosis (LEF)Baseline, 8-week post-intervention visit

Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Assessment Criteria

Change in total severity of external LEF from baseline to 8-week post-intervention visits. A larger change in this score means more reduction in the severity of external LEF.

External LEF is measured by HN-LEF Assessment Criteria. The total external LEF severity score is calculated by summing the severity score of each site (total 9 sites, severity score ranging from 0-27). For each site, the severity of LEF includes no LEF (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), and severe (=3).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Symptom Burden Score: Soft Tissues and Neurologic Toxicity SubscaleBaseline, 8-week post-intervention visit

Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory

Change in symptom burden score from baseline to 8-week post-intervention. A larger change in this score means decreased symptom burden.

Symptom burden is assessed by Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory (HN-LEF SI). Higher scores (score ranging from 0-5) indicate increased symptom burden. There are 7 subscales and only one subscale (Soft Tissues and Neurologic Toxicity) score is reported here.

Neck Range of Motion Degree: Right Lateral RotationBaseline, 8-week post-intervention visit

Change in neck range of motion degree from baseline to 8-week post-intervention. A larger change in this degree means better outcome with increased neck range of motion.

Cervical Range of Motion Device, a valid and reliable tool, was used to measure the amount of neck movement (degrees) for the following neck movements: forward flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, and right and left rotation. Only right lateral rotation is reported here.

Quality of Life Score: Feeding TubeBaseline, 8-week post-intervention visit

EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 was used to assess HNC-related quality of life.

Change in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 score from baseline to 8-week post-intervention. A larger reduction in this score means decreased symptom burden and better quality of life.

The HNC-specific EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 module is a supplement, containing seven multi-item scales (pain, swallowing, senses problems, speech problems, trouble with social eating and social contact, and less sexuality) and eleven single-item scales (teeth, opening mouth, dry mouth, sticky saliva, coughing, felt ill, pain killers, nutritional supplements, feeding tube, weight loss, weight gain). The QLQ-H\&N35 scale employs a 4-point response format (''not at all" to ''very much"). Scale scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 according to the EORTC scoring algorithm. For the symptoms scales, a higher score indicates a higher level of symptom burden. Only feeding tube scale is reported here.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath