Low-Level Laser in Head and Neck Chronic Lymphedema
- Conditions
- Head and Neck CancerFibrosisLymphedema
- Interventions
- Device: Low-level laser
- Registration Number
- NCT04482855
- Lead Sponsor
- Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) on the severity of lymphedema, symptom burden, functional status, and quality of life in HNC survivors.
- Detailed Description
Primary aim: To determine the impact of LLLT, as compared to wait-list control, on changes in severity of lymphedema.
Secondary aim: To determine the impact of LLLT, as compared to a wait-list control, on lymphedema-related symptom burden (e.g., tightness), functional impairments (e.g., range of motion in jaw and neck), and quality of life.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- >18 years of age
- >6 months post HNC treatment
- No evidence of cancer confirmed with imaging tests
- Having head and neck lymphedema with or without fibrosis
- Completion of initial lymphedema therapy
- Lymphedema duration between 3-24 months
- Ability to speak and read English
- Ability to provide informed consent
Patients will be excluded if they have any of the following medical conditions that would prohibit the safe implementation of LLLT:
- Pregnancy
- Acute infection
- Photosensitivity
- Chronic inflammatory diseases
- Venous thrombosis
- Carotid artery stenosis
- History of severe trauma
- Medication that affects body fluid and electrolyte balance
- Use of high doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Pre-existing skin rash, ulceration, open wound in the treatment area
- Active lymphedema therapy or physical therapy
- Allergic and other systemic skin diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group 1 (laser group) Low-level laser Group 1 (laser group): After completion of the baseline measurements, Group 1 participants will be scheduled for LLLT. After completion of LLLT, participants will be scheduled for the 4-week and 8-week follow up data collection.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total Severity of External Lymphedema and Fibrosis (LEF) Baseline, 8-week post-intervention visit Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Assessment Criteria
Change in total severity of external LEF from baseline to 8-week post-intervention visits. A larger change in this score means more reduction in the severity of external LEF.
External LEF is measured by HN-LEF Assessment Criteria. The total external LEF severity score is calculated by summing the severity score of each site (total 9 sites, severity score ranging from 0-27). For each site, the severity of LEF includes no LEF (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), and severe (=3).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Symptom Burden Score: Soft Tissues and Neurologic Toxicity Subscale Baseline, 8-week post-intervention visit Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory
Change in symptom burden score from baseline to 8-week post-intervention. A larger change in this score means decreased symptom burden.
Symptom burden is assessed by Head and Neck Lymphedema and Fibrosis Symptom Inventory (HN-LEF SI). Higher scores (score ranging from 0-5) indicate increased symptom burden. There are 7 subscales and only one subscale (Soft Tissues and Neurologic Toxicity) score is reported here.Neck Range of Motion Degree: Right Lateral Rotation Baseline, 8-week post-intervention visit Change in neck range of motion degree from baseline to 8-week post-intervention. A larger change in this degree means better outcome with increased neck range of motion.
Cervical Range of Motion Device, a valid and reliable tool, was used to measure the amount of neck movement (degrees) for the following neck movements: forward flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, and right and left rotation. Only right lateral rotation is reported here.Quality of Life Score: Feeding Tube Baseline, 8-week post-intervention visit EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 was used to assess HNC-related quality of life.
Change in EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 score from baseline to 8-week post-intervention. A larger reduction in this score means decreased symptom burden and better quality of life.
The HNC-specific EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 module is a supplement, containing seven multi-item scales (pain, swallowing, senses problems, speech problems, trouble with social eating and social contact, and less sexuality) and eleven single-item scales (teeth, opening mouth, dry mouth, sticky saliva, coughing, felt ill, pain killers, nutritional supplements, feeding tube, weight loss, weight gain). The QLQ-H\&N35 scale employs a 4-point response format (''not at all" to ''very much"). Scale scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 according to the EORTC scoring algorithm. For the symptoms scales, a higher score indicates a higher level of symptom burden. Only feeding tube scale is reported here.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States