Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03086213
NCT03086213
Completed
Not Applicable

the Safety and Effectiveness of the Effects on the Perioperative Pain Control Comparing Between the Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Using the Camera Guided and the Intrathoracic Intercostals Nerve Block for the Management of Nonintubated Local Regional Analgesia in Uniport Thoracoscopic Surgery for the Undetermined Solitary Nodules Patients

Shenzhen Third People's Hospital1 site in 1 country48 target enrollmentMarch 1, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Propofol
Conditions
Peripheral Solitary Pulmonary Nodule or Tuberculoma
Sponsor
Shenzhen Third People's Hospital
Enrollment
48
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Comparing the Inflammatory Markers During the Operation After the Intervention of the Each Group
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to study the safety and effectiveness of the effects on the perioperative pain control comparing between the thoracic paravertebral nerve block using the camera guided and the intrathoracic intercostals nerve block for the management of nonintubated local regional analgesia in uniport thoracoscopic surgery for the undetermined solitary nodules patients.

Detailed Description

Thoracoscopic minor lung resection has been the reasonable option for the diagnosis and treatment of management of the undetermined peripheral pulmonary nodules. Uniport procedure could reduce postoperative pain score, the length of hospital stay, moreover, nonintubated technique can avoid the disadvantages of conventional general anesthesia such as ventilator induced lung injury, sore throat or voice change. The nonintubated technique without tracheal intubation under spontaneous ventilation combined with uniport or single port thoracoscopic surgery has emerged as the least invasive procedure of wedge resection of peripheral pulmonary nodules, even the anatomical thoracoscopic lobectomy along with mediastinal lymph nodule dissection in case of the diagnosis of the primary lung cancer during the operation. The initial experience of nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery included the intravenous controlled sedation and pain , thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic vagus nerve block, due to series of adverse events of the epidural analgesia, operator was willing to perform the intrathoracic intercostal nerve block guided by camera during the operation and was considered as the simple and safety method for regional analgesia .However, the intercostal nerve block can not employ the adequate pain control ,after the surgery, the patient controlled analgesia is as usual needed. The previous study showed that paravertebral block was the same effect on relieved pain as thoracic epidural analgesia and had the less complications such as hypotension, nausea or vomiting. With the advance in the technique of application of ultrasound, it is more interesting that using the ultrasound technique before the surgery is performed for the adequate pain control of the local regional analgesia in nonintubated surgery under spontaneous ventilation. However, ultrasound technique is difficult to have the skilled experience for the most anaesthetists and increase the related puncture complications such as hematoma, bleeding or pneumothorax. The method used study is guided by camera which is very simple and safety by avoidance of the puncture of the partial pleura or intercostal blood vessel, The investigators once used this approach for postoperative pain control under general intubation for lung cancer patients, so the investigators have had a skilled experience for achieving regional analgesia of nonintubated uniport thoracoscopic wedge resection. So far, there has been no articles about thoracic paravertebral nerve block for regional analgesia of nonintubated thoracoscopic procedure patients. The investigators designed the study to compare the short term outcome on thoracic paravertebral nerve block in nonintubated technique with those of intercostal nerve block in uniport nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) as the control group. This study will be performed at the third people's hospital of Shenzhen. A total of 48 patients will be enrolled(24 patients in each arms).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 1, 2017
End Date
September 5, 2019
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Shenzhen Third People's Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

xia zhaohua

Director, Head of thoracic surgical department, Principal investigator, Associate clinical professor

Shenzhen Third People's Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • written informed consent
  • the undetermined peripheral solitary pulmonary nodule or tuberculoma was enrolled
  • the well cardiopulmonary function
  • age between 18 and 65 years old
  • less airway secretion
  • body mass index less than 25
  • I to II grade of the American Society of Anesthesiologists
  • no metabolic diseases

Exclusion Criteria

  • refusal or inability to comply with the informed consent
  • the nodule of the nature of the non small cell lung caner is excluded
  • hypovolemia, blood disorders or abnormal clotting mechanism
  • the abnormal cardiopulmonary function(the American Society of Anesthesiologists greater than 3)
  • lower airway infection,more than airway secretion
  • abnormal anatomy of the spine,the history of thoracic back surgery
  • impaired lung function(forced expiratory volume in second 1 less than predicted), or asthma uncontrolled on medications
  • constrained cardiac output such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, mitral stenosis or complete atrioventricular block
  • extensive pleural adhesion
  • overweight (body mass index no less than 25)

Arms & Interventions

paravertebral nerve block group

non-intubated thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T4 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Propofol

paravertebral nerve block group

non-intubated thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T4 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Sulfentanyl

paravertebral nerve block group

non-intubated thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T4 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Dexmedetomidine

paravertebral nerve block group

non-intubated thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T4 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Lidocaine

paravertebral nerve block group

non-intubated thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic paravertebral nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T4 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Ropivacaine

intercostals nerve block group

non-intubated intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T3/4/5 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Propofol

intercostals nerve block group

non-intubated intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T3/4/5 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Sulfentanyl

intercostals nerve block group

non-intubated intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T3/4/5 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Dexmedetomidine

intercostals nerve block group

non-intubated intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T3/4/5 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Lidocaine

intercostals nerve block group

non-intubated intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia Thoracic intercostal nerve block of regional anesthesia at the T3/4/5 thoracic interspace

Intervention: Ropivacaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparing the Inflammatory Markers During the Operation After the Intervention of the Each Group

Time Frame: During the operation, an average of one hour

serum concentrations of Interleukin-6

Concentration of Cortisol at Different Point During the Operation

Time Frame: During the operation, an average of one hour

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of Participants With Puncture Related Complications(7 days)
  • Comparing the Hemodynamics of the Intervention of the Each Group During the Operation(During the operation, an average of one hour)
  • Comparing the Blood Gas Analysis After the Intervention of the Each Group(During the operation, an average of one hour)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials