MedPath

Clinical Scenarios for Long-term Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures With a Wearable Biopotential Technology

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Epilepsy
Interventions
Device: Sensor Dot
Registration Number
NCT04284072
Lead Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Brief Summary

Clinically validate a biopotential and motion recording wearable device (Byteflies Sensor Dot) for detection of epileptic seizures in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) and at home.

Detailed Description

Subjects with refractory epilepsy who are admitted to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) for clinically-indicated long-term video-EEG assessment will be simultaneously monitored with Sensor Dots to record electroencephalographic (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), electromyographic (EMG), and motion signals.

A subset of subjects will continue using Sensor Dot devices at home (Home Phase) after completing the EMU Phase.

The data recorded by Sensor Dots will be used to: 1) annotate epileptic seizures, which will be compared to the annotations made as part of routine EMU monitoring and seizure diaries kept at home, and 2) to develop seizure detection algorithms. The data collected as part of this study will not be used to influence clinical decision making.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
496
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects (4+ years old) with refractory epilepsy who are admitted to the hospital for clinically-indicated long-term video-EEG assessment or presurgical evaluation, and a high likelihood of experiencing seizures during the EMU Phase
  • For subjects continuing into the Home Phase: successful recording of their habitual seizures with Sensor Dot during the EMU Phase
  • For subjects continuing into the Home Phase: the ability to keep an e-diary
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known allergies to any of the biopotential electrodes or adhesives used as part of the study protocol
  • Having an implanted device, such as (but not limited to) a pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and/or neural stimulation device because Sensor Dot contains magnets that could interfere with the operation of these devices
  • Women who are pregnant

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
All subjectsSensor DotSingle arm study with a device intervention for epileptic seizure monitoring in subjects with refractory focal impaired awareness, tonic-clonic, and/or typical absence seizures.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of typical absence seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during sleepup to two weeks

F1-score as determined by expert reviewers

Comparison of focal impaired awareness seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during wakefulnessup to two weeks

F1-score as determined by expert reviewers

Comparison of tonic-clonic seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during sleepup to two weeks

F1-score as determined by expert reviewers

Comparison of typical absence seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during wakefulnessup to two weeks

F1-score as determined by expert reviewers

Comparison of focal impaired awareness seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during sleepup to two weeks

F1-score as determined by expert reviewers

Comparison of tonic-clonic seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during wakefulnessup to two weeks

F1-score as determined by expert reviewers

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sensor Dot usabilityup to two weeks

We will assess the usability of the device as perceived by users (patients and healthcare personnel) via surveys

To assess the usability of the seizure e-diaryup to two weeks

We will asses usability of the electronic seizure diary

To evaluate the accuracy of automated seizure detection algorithms2 years

We will use the collected data and seizure annotations to develop algorithms to automatically detect epileptic seizures. We plan to evaluate how accurate these new automated seizure detection algorithms are.

To assess seizure durationup to two weeks

From the Sensor Dot data, we will be able to assess seizure duration

Comparison of seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the Home Phase against seizure diary annotationsup to 2 weeks

Accuracy as determined by expert reviewers

Sensor Dot Performanceup to 2 weeks

We will assess the technical performance of the device by comparing the actual length of recorded data against the expected recording length, and what percentage of the data is high quality enough to make seizure annotations.

Trial Locations

Locations (7)

Division of Neurology, Coimbra University Hospital

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή

Coimbra, Portugal

University Hospitals Leuven, department of Neurology

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Leuven, Belgium

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ

Stockholm, Sweden

Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center, Freiburg University

πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ

Freiburg, Germany

Department of Epileptology and Neurology

πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ

Aachen, Germany

Division of Neuroscience, King's College London

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

London, United Kingdom

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University Hospital

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Oxford, United Kingdom

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath