Comparison the effectiveness of microneedling with SRGF versus conventional microneedling in periorbital skin rejuvenation in middle-aged wome
- Conditions
- Skin Rejuvenation.Atrophic disorder of skin, unspecifiedL90.9
- Registration Number
- IRCT20140911019125N4
- Lead Sponsor
- Skin & Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Female gender
Presence of aging signs of periorbital with grade 3-5
Patients aged between 30-50 years
Patients desire to microneedling and blood sampling
Menopause patients
Patients that received systemic retinoids treatments (in recent 6 months) or local retinoids treatments (in recent 2 weeks)
History of hemorrhagic disorders or recent receiving anti-coagulant treatments
Any factor that inhibit low invasive techniques
Patients with autoimmune diseases.
Women in pregnant or lactation period
Doing skin procedures and racer-facing lasers
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Skin Elasticity. Timepoint: Before intervention and 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Specific Equipment.;Skin Moisture. Timepoint: Before intervention and 2 month after intervention. Method of measurement: Specific Equipment.;Skin Pigmentation distribution. Timepoint: Before intervention and 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Specific Equipment.;Sebum Activity. Timepoint: Before intervention and 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Specific Equipment.;Skin oil. Timepoint: Before intervention and 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Specific Equipment.;Skin Wrinkle. Timepoint: Before intervention and 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Examination.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method