MedPath

Evaluation of Objective Pain Measurement Device

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Analgesia
Pain
Labor Pain
Registration Number
NCT03975660
Lead Sponsor
Stanford University
Brief Summary

This study will attempt to objectively measure pain with an experimental device. The investigators will apply the device to measure patients "pain" due to uterine contractions during routine clinical care to correlate patients verbal pain ratings and analgesia requirements to that measured by the device. A brain oxygenation device, Edwards Foresight, will be used to concurrently to monitor brain oxygenation and hemodynamics, so the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device objective measure of pain and brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain can be determined.

Detailed Description

Despite all the progress in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of pain, the gold standard for measuring pain is still a subjective verbal numeric rating scale rating (0-10) obtained from the individual reporting pain. This method is not objective and cannot be used in all patient populations. This study will attempt to objectively measure pain in laboring mothers with a pain measurement device. The investigators aim to 1) see if the pain measurement device (CereVu ROPA) is capable of reflecting different levels of pain ratings in patients in labor having uterine contractions and then changes in pain after receiving different neuraxial techniques for labor pain and to 2) additionally determine the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device, brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain scores.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
110
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18-50
  • ASA 1 or 3 +/-E
  • Patient requesting epidural labor analgesia
  • Good toco tracing (clearly showing contractions at least every 5 minutes)
  • Pain score greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 with contractions
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of chronic pain
  • History of chronic opioid use
  • BMI > 45
  • Allergy to sensor adhesive material, local anesthetic or opioids
  • Contraindication to neuraxial block
  • Patient on magnesium infusion
  • Inability to give informed consent or understand English

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Correlation Between Pain Score and Noninvasive Blood PressureDuring labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter noninvasive blood pressure. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.

Average Self-report Pain ScoreDuring labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Average patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)

Correlation of Average Device Pain Score to Average Self-report Pain ScoreDuring labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Pearson correlation

Correlation Between Pain Score and Brain OxygenationDuring labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and brain oxygenation (0-100%). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.

Correlation Between Pain Score and Heart RateDuring labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter heart rate. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.

Correlation Between Pain Score and Pulse OximetryDuring labor up to 2 hours after epidural

Correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter pulse oximetry (Sp02). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Count of Participants With Cesarean Deliveryfrom epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Time to Reach Pain Score 2 or Less Out of 10within 45 minutes after the block placement

Pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)

Time Taken for Pain Device Score to be Below Validated Valuewithin 45 minutes after the block placement

Validated value is from the validated reading recorded by the sensor in the pilot study

Patient Reported Pain Scores After BlockUp to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement

Pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain). Pain scores were obtained at random intervals and the scores were summed and averaged to create the reported score. Patients stopped rating pain once the level dropped to zero.

Device Recorded Pain Scores After BlockUp to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement

Device pain score validated measure (range: 0 to 10, higher scores correspond to more pain). Pain scores were obtained at random intervals and the scores were summed and averaged to create the reported score. Device recording was discontinued when pain level dropped to zero.

Dermatomal Level at 45 Minutes After Block Placement as a Measure of Sensory Blockade Level45 minutes
Count of Participants With Block Failureswithin 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Maternal Side Effectswithin 45 minutes after the block placement

Monitored maternal side effects will include nausea, pruritis, hypotension

Count of Participants With Fetal Side Effectswithin 45 minutes after the block placement

Monitored fetal side effects include fetal decelerations early/variable/late

Count of Participants Needing Physician Interventionwithin 45 minutes after the block placement
Time From Epidural to Deliveryfrom epidural to delivery (average approximately 9 hours)
Count of Participants With Normal Vaginal Deliveryfrom epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Assisted Vaginal Deliveryfrom epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Stanford University

🇺🇸

Stanford, California, United States

Stanford University
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.