跳至主要内容
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
临床试验/NCT02158247
NCT02158247已完成不适用

Determining the Depth of Endotracheal Tube Insertion

The Catholic University of Korea1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 176 人开始时间: 2012年1月最近更新:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
176
试验地点
1
主要终点
Airway Length vs Height in Female
研究概览研究设计入排标准结局指标研究者研究点记录与标识符相似试验

研究概览

简要总结

  1. Airway length from the medial incisor to carina is divided into four segments ; the length from medial incisor to mouth angle, mouth angle to epiglottis, epiglottis to vocal cords and vocal cords to carina.
  2. Determining the mean length of each segments with the direct laryngoscope, videolaryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope at the time of endotracheal intubation.
  3. Making a new formula to determine the proper individualized depth of intubation on the basis of the length of segments
  4. Virtual experiment : comparing the new formula with conventional method of determining the depth of endotracheal intubation

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 90 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Patients who are scheduled to take general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation

排除标准

  • •Patients undergoing general anesthesia with face mask ventilation or laryngeal mask airway

结局指标

主要结局

Airway Length vs Height in Female

时间窗: Endotracheal intubation time

Airway Length vs Height in Male

时间窗: Endotracheal intubation time

Comparison of Airway Length Between Male and Female

时间窗: Endotracheal intubation time

Airway length is defined the distance from medial incisor to carina. It is divided into four parts. It is medial incisor to mouth angle, mouth angle to epiglottis tip, epiglottis tip to vocal cords and vocal cords to carina.

次要结局

  • Comparison Between Conventional Method and Touch and Read Method for Risk Group of Female(Endotracheal intubation time)
  • Comparison Between Conventional Method and Touch and Read Method for Normal Group of Female(Endotracheal intubation time)
  • Comparison Between Conventional Method and Touch and Read Method for Risk Group of Male(Endotracheal intubation time)
  • Comparison Between Conventional Method and Touch and Read Method for Normal Group of Male(Endotracheal intubation time)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Saecheol Oh

Associate Professor

The Catholic University of Korea

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

尚未招募
Unknown
To compare the accuracy of different methods of endotracheal tube insertion in neonates.
CTRI/2024/04/066090OT APPLICABLE
已完成
不适用
To check the movement of airway tube after placing patient head in position for head and neck cancer surgery
CTRI/2022/04/041671Seema60
招募中
不适用
Assessment of the depth of insertion of endotracheal tube in childre
CTRI/2015/06/005871Kasturba Hospital KMC Manipal80
Unknown
不适用
Correct Endotracheal Tube Placement Using Topographical LandmarksIntubation, IntratrachealAnatomic Landmarks
NCT05439109Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center, India400
已完成
不适用
Confirmation of the depth of endotracheal tube with saline-filled cuff by ultrasoundendotracheal tubecricoid cartilagetracheal cuffultrasound
TCTR20170321001none132