MedPath

Effectiveness of Triclosan Coated Sutures in Preventing Leg Wound Infection After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Phase 4
Conditions
Complication of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Surgical Wound Infection
Interventions
Other: Conventional non-coated surgical sutures
Registration Number
NCT01457859
Lead Sponsor
Rambam Health Care Campus
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether triclosan-coated sutures reduces wound infections compared to regular non-coated sutures, after saphenous vein harvesting in CABG patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
410
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age or older with written informed consent
  • Male and female subjects
  • Subjects scheduled for an elective and urgent CABG surgery that includes saphenous vein harvesting.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known allergy or intolerance to triclosan
  • Different surgical prophylactic antibiotic regimen than common in the department.
  • Continuous preoperative and predicted postoperative antibiotic treatment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional suturesConventional non-coated surgical sutures-
Antiseptic suturesTriclosan-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
leg wound infectionUp to 45 days postsurgery

Proportion of subjects with leg wound infection in research versus control group within 45 days of surgery according to CDC SSI criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Antibiotics administrationUp to 45 days postsurgery

Amount of administered antibiotic for leg wound infection after surgery

Hospital Length of stayAverage of 7 days postsurgery
Incidence of hospital re-admission due to leg wound infectionWithin 45 days postsurgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rambam Health Care Campus, Depatment of cardiac surgery

🇮🇱

Haifa, Israel

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath