Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03570567
NCT03570567
Unknown
Not Applicable

Clinical Luminal Endoscopic Assessment of a Novel Suction (CLEANS) Technique for the Treatment of Esophageal Food Impaction

Biomerics, LLC1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentJune 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Esophageal Food Impaction
Sponsor
Biomerics, LLC
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Food Bolus Clearance
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety, performance, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic technique for resolving esophageal food impactions by using a novel hollow suction catheter, Piranha GI Aspiration Catheter, to core out and suction food away from the center of an impaction. This technique includes hollowing out the center of the impaction, thus reducing the volume of the food bolus in the center, allowing the food to collapse into the hollow center, and then allowing for spontaneous food passage into the stomach. The study design is based on the experience of the investigators and the general knowledge of the food impaction field. In addition, consideration was given to previous studies of endoscopic treatments for esophageal food impaction.

Detailed Description

CLEANS Synopsis Protocol Number 001 Procedure/Device Endoscopy using a standard suction catheter Sponsor Biomerics Advanced Catheter Primary Objective The objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a novel coring/suctioning technique for esophageal food impactions using a suction catheter. Data obtained from this clinical trial will be used to support this technique for standard clinical use. Proposed Use Esophageal food impactions. Study Design This is a single-arm, open label observational trial designed to assess the efficacy of a novel suction technique for the treatment of esophageal food impactions. The endoscopists performing the procedure are not blinded to the treatment. Follow-Up Schedule There is no follow-up after the procedure. Number of Subjects/Sites 40 non-randomized subjects, 10 at 4 investigational sites. Exclusion Criteria 1. Unable to tolerate an endoscopic procedure. 2. Has a condition that could lead to significant postoperative complications, including current infection, anticoagulant use (Note: this is a relative exclusion since these patients still may require endoscopic food clearance). 3. Enrolled in a concurrent clinical food impaction trial. 4. Inability to comply with the consent process (as determined by investigator). 5. Pregnant. Statistical Methods Statistical Methods were developed based on the Safety Primary Endpoint. A sample size of 40 (10 at each site) achieves 80% power to detect a safety non-inferiority difference of 0.1322 using a one-sided exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. These results assume a baseline adverse event proportion of 0.03. The non-inferiority difference is justified by the low risk nature of the procedure. The sample size achieves 80% power to detect a performance non-inferiority difference of -0.1837 using a one-sided exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. These results assume a baseline bolus clearance proportion of 0.75. The non-inferiority difference is justified by the low risk nature of the procedure. Efficacy/performance procedure time endpoint will be assessed with time distribution analysis and with linear regression techniques using clinician, site, type of impaction, cause, age, gender, and weight as factors. Other factors may be included. Efficacy/performance secondary endpoints will be assessed with score distribution analysis and with linear regression techniques using clinician, site, type of impaction, cause, age, gender, and weight as factors. Other factors may be included. Sample size requirements 40 patients, 10 patients at each site. Analysis cohorts All patients who undergo endoscopy for a food impaction. Safety Assessments Adverse events will be summarized by seriousness, severity, relationship to device and procedure and adverse event type. Additional Analyses None intended at this time. Randomization Patients will not be randomized. Blinding Neither subjects nor endoscopists will be blinded to the study treatment. Study Duration The study participation will end following the procedure.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2018
End Date
September 2018
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Esophageal food impaction requiring endoscopic intervention.
  • Male or female.
  • Willing to participate and capable of understanding the clinical study procedure and giving informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to tolerate an endoscopic procedure.
  • Has a condition that could lead to significant postoperative complications, including current infection, anticoagulant use (Note: this is a relative exclusion since these patients still may require endoscopic food clearance).
  • Enrolled in a concurrent clinical food impaction trial.
  • Inability to comply with the consent process (as determined by investigator).
  • Pregnant.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Food Bolus Clearance

Time Frame: During procedure

The first primary endpoint will be to assess the complete food bolus clearance rate.

Time to Clearance

Time Frame: During procedure

The second will be time to complete clearance.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Ease of Use(Immediately following procedure)
  • Satisfaction(Immediately following procedure)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials