To Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of the Esteem® Hearing Implant in Subjects Suffering From Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Sponsor
- Envoy Medical Corporation
- Enrollment
- 51
- Locations
- 5
- Primary Endpoint
- Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Speech Reception Threshold (SRT)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Esteem® Hearing Implant in subjects suffering from moderate to severe hearing loss.
Detailed Description
The Post Approval Study is an extension of the pivotal clinical trial, which was designed as a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esteem® System. For this trial the subject acts as his or her own control. This trial has been designed to meet the United States' regulatory requirements. The subjects included in this study include the 57 subjects implanted under the original Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study and the five (5) subjects implanted under the continued access expansion approved by the FDA. Of these 62 subjects, all but one (explant) were available for continued follow-up. These subjects were re-consented for the 5 year Post Approval Study. No new subjects were enrolled and implanted in this study. The goal was to monitor a minimum of 45 subjects through their five (5) year follow-up. Ultimately, 51 subjects completed the study. The following questions are to be answered: * Is the Esteem effective through 5 year follow-up? * Is the Esteem safe through 5 year follow-up?
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Subject must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for treatment in the trial:
- •Subject is at least 18 years old
- •Subject understands the nature of the procedure and has signed the Subject Informed Consent Form prior to the procedure
- •Subject is willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and understands the audiological test procedures and use of the Esteem® System.
- •Subject has moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss between 500 and 4000 Hz in the ear to be implanted with pure tone air-conduction threshold levels within the limits of a Hearing Aid (HA) as follow:
- •Freq (Hz) 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 Lower Level (dB HL) 30 35 35 35 35 Upper Level (dB HL) 100 100 100 100 100
- •Subject's air-bone gap is no greater than 10 dB at 4 of the 5 following frequencies: 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz.
- •Subject has an unaided maximum word recognition score of greater than or equal to 40% with recorded delivery using a phonetically balanced word list at Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) + 40 dB or at maximum tolerable presentation level.
- •Subject is a current user of a properly functioning and appropriately fit hearing aid. This is defined as the subject has used this aid for at least four (4) hours (average) per day (in the ear to be implanted) for at least three (3) months for a new aid or one (1) month for an adjusted aid.
- •Subject's hearing aid, in the ear to be implanted, shall appropriately fit optimally.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subjects will be excluded from the trial if any one of the following criteria is met:
- •Subject has a history of post-adolescent chronic middle ear infections, inner ear disorders or recurring vertigo requiring treatment, disorders such as mastoiditis, Hydrops or Meniere's syndrome or disease
- •Subject has a history of external otitis or eczema for the outer ear canal and the investigator believes this will affect the Esteem® System implantation
- •Subject has cholesteatoma or destructive middle ear disease
- •Subject has life expectancy of less than two (2) years due to other medical conditions
- •Subject has retrocochlear or central auditory disorders
- •Subject is known to be suffering from any psychological, developmental, physical, or emotional disorder that the investigator feels would interfere with the surgery or follow-up testing
- •Subject has a known history of fluctuating air conduction and/or bone conduction hearing loss over a one-year period of 15 dB in either direction at 2 or more frequencies (from 500 - 4000 Hz)
- •Subject has sudden hearing loss due to unknown cause
- •Subject has a history of disabling tinnitus, defined as tinnitus which required treatment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Speech Reception Threshold (SRT)
Time Frame: Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
ENDPOINT #1: SRT at baseline minus SRT at Year 5. Positive difference (i.e. lower value of SRT with the Esteem) indicates better outcome.
Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Word Recognition Score (WRS) at 50 dB HL
Time Frame: Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
ENDPOINT #2: WRS at Year 5 minus WRS at baseline. Positive difference (in % correct) indicates better outcome.
Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Events (SADEs) and Device Failures and Replacements at Each Follow-up.
Time Frame: SADEs, PAS phase through Year 5 of Follow Up
ENDPOINT #3: The analysis of the incidence of SADEs and device failures and replacements at each follow-up.
Bone Conduction Stability
Time Frame: Baseline through 5 Year Follow-Up
ENDPOINT #5: Difference between Baseline and 5 Year Pure-Tone Average (PTA; average of 500, 1000, 2000 Hz thresholds); calculated as PTA at Year 5 minus PTA at baseline. Smaller magnitude dB difference indicates better outcome.
Secondary Outcomes
- Improvement in Quality of Life as Reflected by Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaire(Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up)