The Norwegian Addiction, Pain and Trauma Study
- Conditions
- Post-traumatic Stress DisorderChronic PainSubstance Use Disorders
- Registration Number
- NCT04908410
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Akershus
- Brief Summary
In populations with substance use disorders (SUD), there is a high prevalence of chronic pain with various underlying causes. Chronic pain can complicate the treatment of SUD and lead to poorer treatment outcomes. There is a need for a better understanding of the connections and interactions between chronic pain and substance use and dependence.
Further, there is a high prevalence of chronic pain among patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As there is an overlap between populations with SUD and PTSD, taking potentially traumatizing life-experiences and post-traumatic stress symptoms into account can provide a better understanding of chronic pain in populations with SUD.
The Nor-APT study is a cross-sectional study, recruiting from outpatient and inpatient substance use treatment centres connected to four hospitals. Participants complete a questionnaire about substance/medication use, pain and how pain affect function, stressful life events and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Patients can consent to self-reported data being linked to retrospective and prospective longitudinal data from national demographic and health registries.
The purpose of the study is to contribute to a better understanding and treatment of chronic pain among people with substance use disorders (SUD), and to contribute to the understanding of co-occurring substance use, chronic pain and post-traumatic stress symptoms.
The over-arching research aims are to:
I. Describe the prevalence and characteristics of pain for people in need of treatment for substance/medication use/dependence.
II. Describe how the pain affects physical and emotional functioning, and subjective quality of life.
III. Explore any connections between substance/medication use and pain, both what came first and any ways substance/medication use and pain affect each other.
IV. Explore the connection between chronic pain, potentially traumatizing life events and post-traumatic stress symptoms.
V. Explore how treatments received and how treatment affects outcomes.
In addition, we will explore whether participants' experiences can be categorized into typical trajectories for how substance use, chronic pain and stressful life events occur and develop over the life span.
- Detailed Description
INTRODUCTION
Chronic pain and substance use
The prevalence of chronic pain is high among persons with opioid dependence and alcohol dependence. According to a recent review, it is common for patients to use both opioids and alcohol, and this is seen especially in cases where the patient also experiences chronic pain. Nevertheless, alcohol use is often omitted from research on opioids and chronic pain. The review concludes that there is a great need for more knowledge about co-use of alcohol and opioids in people with chronic pain.
The high prevalence of chronic pain in populations with opioid or alcohol dependence could be related to comorbid physical illness and injuries, which is prevalent among opioid dependent patients. It is also possible that use of opioids or alcohol can contribute to pain sensitivity and worsening of pain over time.
There have been few studies focusing on chronic pain and dependence on other substances than opioids or alcohol. The prevalence of chronic pain among people with, for example, amphetamine dependence or cannabis dependence has received little attention, although cannabinoids are also used as prescription painkillers.
A study of the general population in the United States found a link between chronic pain and marijuana use, but could not discern whether the pain or marijuana use came first. In a small study, two out of five people using marijuana or cocaine reported using the substances as pain relief. Amphetamine is also a highly relevant substance when it comes to pain, as amphetamines can be analgesic, and can enhance the analgesic effect of opioids.
Chronic pain is associated with poorer treatment outcomes, however there is little knowledge about how co-occurring chronic pain and substance dependence develops over time. More knowledge about the mechanisms behind co-occurring chronic pain and dependence can contribute to better treatment options for patients, both when it comes to the treatment of pain and dependence.
Chronic pain and PTSD
Chronic pain and pain intensity have a documented association with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the general population, but have not been much explored among people with dependence. A small study has found a higher prevalence of chronic pain among people with co-occurring substance dependence and PTSD, but the study was not large enough (n = 133) to distinguish between dependence on different types of substances. One study (n = 150) found a higher prevalence of PTSD among methadone patients with chronic pain.
Unfortunately, PTSD is a diagnosis that has historically been considered difficult to treat among people with substance use disorder. Therefore PTSD is undertreated for these patients.
The link between chronic pain and PTSD is not fully understood. In some cases, the pain may be caused by a physical injury in connection with the event that caused the PTSD. Beyond these cases, some theories focus on shared vulnerability, or that chronic pain and PTSD reinforce each other through excessive reactions to or misinterpretation of stress or pain stimuli. Other theories focus on the biological aspects, such as dysregulation of the nervous system or dysregulation of opioid receptors.
It is also possible that the PTSD symptoms associated with overactivation may drive the association between PTSD and pain. This makes it relevant to explore any potential interaction effects of PTSD symptoms and the use of sedative and stimulating substances/medications on the experience of pain.
A better understanding of the links between chronic pain, PTSD and dependence can mean a lot for better treatment of patients with comorbid substance dependence, PTSD and pain disorders.
METHODS
Design. Cross-sectional survey study, with linkage to retrospective and prospective registry data. The NOR-APT study employs a rarely utilized research design where survey data containing the patients' self-reported experiences are combined with high quality, nearly complete, longitudinal registry data from the first and second line health care services and the prescription database, as well as sociodemographic registries.
Data from the first registration of the patient in the registries can be linked to self-reported data through personal identification numbers retained by all residents, providing a complete history of treatments and diagnoses.
It is a multicentre study, with data collected from over 20 substance use treatment centres in the catchment areas for Akershus University Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Vestfold Hospital Trust and Telemark Hospital in Norway.
Participants. The goal is to recruit 1 500 patients entering any form of substance use treatment at the 20+ collaborating inpatient and outpatient clinics.
Staff at the treatment centres are instructed to ask all patients. At the time-points where 500 and 1 000 questionnaires have been completed, the investigators will assess the distribution of participants according to their primary substance use problem/the substance they are in treatment for. If the distribution is skewed in a manner that may not give enough data about some sub-groups of substance users, the investigators may encourage staff at the treatment centres to continue with more selective recruitment of the patient groups that are underrepresented. For instance, many patients are treated for opioid or alcohol dependence, so this group may be recruited faster and more easily, while patients with a primary dependence to cannabis or amphetamines may be fewer and could require more time and effort to reach a sufficiently large sample size.
Materials. The questionnaire was developed based on the research questions, previous literature, and in collaboration with the clinicians that see the patient groups in their day to day practice at Akershus University Hospital and Oslo University Hospital. The questionnaire was piloted on 10 patients with different substance use patterns, where patients were asked to comment on the experience of filling in the questionnaire, the length and clarity of the questions, and give any other comments or suggestions. Further adjustments to the layout and wording of certain questions were made based on the results of the piloting.
To make the data-collection process as uniform as possible, a questionnaire guide for staff was made, with a standard text for introducing and explaining the questionnaire to patients, and with a walk-through of the questions with additional explanations, definitions and problem-solving for common issues when filling out the different type of questions. In the guide, other topics related to collecting survey-data were also addressed, such as concerns related to missing responses for data validity and how to balance the preference for complete answers with ensuring that all questions were answered on a completely voluntary basis.
An instructional 15 minute video for staff was made, with an explanation of the background and purpose of the study, as a measure to increase understanding and motivation for recruiting patients to the study.
Registry data: The Norwegian registries consist of high-quality data on for instance treatment episodes, diagnoses, prescribed medications and socioeconomic variables, with nearly complete data for all individuals in Norway.
Procedure. Each treatment centre has a study coordinator responsible for ensuring all staff has access to questionnaires, guides and the instructional video. The coordinators task is to inform staff and distributed the study material. The coordinator will also report on progress, issues and concerns to the central study coordinators throughout the data collection period.
Staff at the treatment centres are instructed to invite all patients (except those affected by the exclusion criteria) to participate. Patients will be informed that participation is voluntary and that declining to participate will not affect the treatment they receive, about the purpose of the study and how the information they give will be handled. The number of patients that decline participation will be logged, and if the patients consent to disclosing the information, the gender, age and which substance they are in treatment for/their primary substance problem, will also be logged for patients that decline participation.
Patients that agree to participate will complete the consent form and the questionnaire. If they wish to withdraw from the study at a later time, they can contact the treatment centre or the research group.
For participants who consent to linkage of questionnaire data with longitudinal registry data, linkage to retrospective registry data will be performed about a year after collection of questionnaire data has been completed, and linkage to prospective registry data will be done 5-6 years after the collection of questionnaire data have been completed. Linkages are performed by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Statistics Norway, based on the patients explicit consent and unique personal identification number.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1650
- Patient in substance use treatment at a treatment centre under Akershus University Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Vestfold Hospital or Telemark Hospital.
Staff considers the patient to be unable to give informed consent/valid responses on the questionnaire OR staff considers participation to be too stressful/burdensome to the patient. Staff are asked to take the following into consideration when making their assessment:
- Acute withdrawal
- Acute intoxication
- Serious mental health concerns
- Serious physical health concerns
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Chronic pain (ICD-10) T1 (at enrollment in study) Defined as having experienced pain with a duration of at least 3 months.
European-Addiction Severity Index (EuropASI), Section E T1 (at enrollment in study) * Types of substances used (life-time), age of first use, and frequency of use in the last 4 weeks.
* Intravenous use (life-time and last 4 weeks)
Modifications:
1. We updated the list of substances to better match the relevant substances in use today: Alcohol to intoxication; OMT medications (methadone; subutex; suboxone); Other opioid painkillers (e.g. morphine, oxycodone, tramadol); Cannabis; Amphetamine/ Methamphetamine; Cocaine; Benzodiazepines; GHB; Hallucinogenics (e.g. LSD, mushrooms, mescaline); Anabolic steroids; Khat.
2. Frequency of use in the last 4 weeks: the response categories "used not more than 2-3 times per month" and " used 1-3 times a week" were collapsed into one category "used a few times", leaving three categories: "Not used", "used a few times" and "every day/nearly every day".The Stressful Life-Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) T1 (at enrollment in study) The SLESQ assesses exposure to stressful life-events (yes/no) that could be potentially traumatizing. This version has been shortened and adapted in previous studies at the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS) for use in Norway and includes a list of 15 types of stressful events. This variable will be used to assess the prevalence of different types of stressful life-events. In addition the number of events can be summed to indicate the extent of exposure to stressful life-event, with a range from 0 events to 15.
Modifications:
1. Two events have been added: Being directly involved in a natural disaster and having been repeatedly ridiculed, put down, ignored or told you were no good by someone outside the family.
2. When several of the 15 types of events have occured, the participants' age at the time of the event is only recorded for the first event and the event that gives the participant the most symptoms now.The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 - short version (PCL-5 short) T1 (at enrollment in study) The short version of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 includes 4 items: 1 item for each symptom cluster for the diagnosis of PTSD according to the DSM-5.
Participants indicate how much each symptom has bothered them in the last month on a scale from 0 to 4 ("Not at all" to "Very much"). The sum score ranges from 0 to 16. A score above the cut score of 10 indicates risk for PTSD, and has previously been validated as a diagnostic indicator.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain characteristics T1 (at enrollment in study) Patients that report any pain in the last 4 weeks are asked:
* to indicate the location/s of the pain on a body map with 25 different pain locations (from the Norwegian Pain Association)
* to indicate any generalized pain in the skin, muscles, joints or skeleton/bones (selfmade checklist).
* the duration of their pain (less than 3 months; 3-12 months; 1-3 years; 4-6 years; 7-10 years; more than 10 years)
* the cause of their pain (illness; accident/injury; violence; surgery; other; unknown), their age at that time and whether they believe the cause was related to their substance use (selfmade questions, the list of causes collected from previous studies).Opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) history (selfmade) T1 (at enrollment in study) * Have you ever been in OMT? (No/Methadone/Subutex/Buvidal/Suboxone/Other (specify)) Age at the time of the first prescription.
* Are you in OMT now? (No/Methadone/Subutex/Buvidal/Suboxone/Other (specify)) Age at the start of this prescription.Subjective quality of life (QOL-1) T1 (at enrollment in study) - How satisfied are you with your life? The response is given on an 11-point numeric rating scale, from 0 "Not satisfied at all" to 10 "Very satisfied".
The Brief Pain Inventory: Pain intensity T1 (at enrollment in study) Pain intensity will be assess with 4 items addressing pain intensity right now; on average; the strongest in the last week; the weakest in the last week. Responses are given on an 11 point numeric rating scale from 0 "No pain" to 10 "The worst pain imaginable". These 4 items can be used independently or averaged.
The Brief Pain Inventory: Pain interference T1 (at enrollment in study) Pain interference on different life domains in the last week will be assessed with 7 items from the BPI: general activity, ability to walk, normal work/housework, mood, sleep, relationships to others, enjoyment of life
Responses are given on an 11 point numeric rating scale from 0 "Not influenced at all" to 10 "Completely influenced".
The 7 items can be averaged to give an overall interference score from 0 (low) to 10 (high), or they can be divided into affective interference (mood, sleep, relationships, enjoyment of life) and activity interference (walking, activity, work).
In addition, we include1 selfmade item in the same format, about interference on subjective quality of life: satisfaction with life.Nicotine use T1 (at enrollment in study) * Do you smoke cigarettes or a pipe? (Yes/No)
* Do you use snuff? (Yes/No)Other pain related questions (selfmade) T1 (at enrollment in study) * Have you contacted a medical doctor for help with your pain? (Yes/no). If yes, age at the time (open ended question)
* Did you receive treatment for your pain? (yes/no) If yes, what type of treatment (open ended question).
* Is it difficult for you now to stop using substances/medications because of
* pain? (No/ A little/ Very)
* worrying about pain? (No/ A little/ Very)
* Are there substance/medications (including over the counter pain medications) that...
* ...help with your pain? (open ended question)
* ... make your pain worse? (open ended question)
* The first time you used opioids, was it to relieve pain? (Never used opioids/No/Yes/Don't know)
* Has pain ever influenced the type of medication received in OMT? (No/Yes/Don't know) If yes, which medication? (open ended), what was your age at the time? (open ended), Any comments? (open ended).Demographics T1 (at enrollment in study) * Age
* Gender (Woman/man)
* Are you currently working/studying? (No/Yes (full or parttime) OR On sickleave/Retired/Disabled)ICD-10/11 diagnostic codes Retrospective (back to 2008) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) we wi receive all registered contacts/treatments with the secondary specialist health care services (for somatic diseases, mental health and substance dependence), including ICD codes and dates for treatment start and end.
Prescribed medications Retrospective (back to 2004) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) we will receive all registered medications with dates for when they were collected from the pharmacy.
Treatments in the primary health services Retrospective (back to 2016) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the municipal health registry (KPR) we will receive codes for all treatments in the primary (municipal) health services, including emergency care, general practitioners and dentists.
Pain treatment Retrospective (back to 2013) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the national quality registry for pain treatment (SmerteReg) we can receive additional details concerning pain treatment
Treatments of patients with severe physical trauma Retrospective (since establishment of database) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the national traumaregister (NTR) we can receive information on patients who have received treatments for severe physical trauma.
Cancer diagnosis and treatments Retrospective (since establishment of database) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the Cancer registry we can receive additional information on cancer diagnosis and treatments.
Time and cause of death Prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the Cause of death registry we will receive the date and cause of death for patients who have died during the 5-year follow-up period.
Level of education Retrospective (back to 1960s) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the demographic database of Statistics Norway we will receive information on the highest level of completed education.
Birthcountry and immigration status Retrospective (back to 1960s) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the demographic database of Statistics Norway we will receive information on birth country and 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation immigration status.
Income and employment status Retrospective (back to 1960s) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the demographic database of Statistics Norway we will receive information of types of income and employment status, sick-leave and benefits.
Living conditions Retrospective (back to 1960s) and prospective (5 year follow-up from completion of the questionnaire) From the demographic database of Statistics Norway we will receive information on type of dwelling, number of persons in the household, moves between houses.
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Akershus University Hospital
🇳🇴Lørenskog, Norway
Oslo University Hospital
🇳🇴Oslo, Norway
Telemark Hospital
🇳🇴Skien, Norway
The Hospital in Vestfold
🇳🇴Tønsberg, Norway