Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00460291
NCT00460291UnknownNot Applicable

Pilot Study to Asses the Function and Patency of Polyester-Coated Composite Bypasses From Autologous Varicose Veins

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital22 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2005Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
50
Locations
22
Primary Endpoint
infection rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

If patients need to undergo bypass surgery, either an autologous vein can be used as bypass or, if there are no suitable veins are available, a prosthetic graft can be implanted. Varicose veins normally are judged not to be suitable as bypass. The ProVena vein support, made from polyester, is considered to strengthen varicose veins so that they they become suitable as bypass. Thereby, the advantages of an autologous bypass and the stability of polyester material can be combined.

Patients that take part in the trial recieve an autologus bypass with a varicose vein, coated with ProVena. They are followed up at 3 and 6 months after implantation of a ProVena-coated bypass via duplex-sonography to assess the graft patency.

Detailed Description

The ProVena trial is a non-randomised multi-centre trial, aiming to assess the suitability of the ProVena vein support.

Currently, autologous veins are preferred to prosthetic grafts (Klinkert et al. 2004), but they are not considered to be suitable if they are varicose.

Some early data indicate that these veins can be used if an external support is applied (Moritz et al. 1993, 1992, Neufang et al. 2003). The proVena vein graft has been tested in animal experiments. All bypasses showed a reduced intima hyperplasia, no disadvantages were found. Nevertheless, as a ProVena-coated bypass cannot be regarded as completely autologus, it is necessary whether the coating does not increase the risk of

  • infections
  • scar formation, reducing the patency
  • higher incidence of seroma

ProVena is made from polyester filaments, similar to the material used for prosthetic grafts. As the material is used since years in peripheral bypass surgery, we do not expect increased risks.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • aged > 18 years 18 Jahre.
  • informed consent has been given and patients is complient to protocol
  • patient needs femoro-distal bypass surgery
  • only varicose ektatic veins are available
  • Bypass diameter > 5mm proximal and > 4mm distal.

Exclusion Criteria

  • aged < 18 years
  • patient unable to take part in the follow-up
  • known sensibility to polyester
  • patient not expected to survive the next 12 months due to significant comorbidities
  • HIV-infection
  • Patient suffering from a floriding infection at the time of inclusion
  • infection or colonisation with MRSA
  • pregnancy
  • use of immunosuppresive drugs

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

infection rate

primary patency

primary assisted patency

secondary patency

Secondary Outcomes

  • occurrence of complications
  • occurence of stenoses
  • time needed for preparation of the bypass vein
  • technical success

Investigators

Sponsor
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (22)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials