Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03674190
NCT03674190WithdrawnNot Applicable

A Study Comparing the Outcome of Anterior Lumbar Fusion and Total Lumbar Disc Replacement

Svante Berg2 sites in 1 countryStarted: September 4, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Withdrawn
Sponsor
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
ODI, Oswestry Disability Index

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Total lumbar disc replacement has previously been compared to posterior fusion of the lumbar spine, showing some favor towards total disc replacement. The study aims to compare total disc replacement to anterior fusion, sparing the muscles of the back and thus comparing the two different methods using the same surgical approach.

Detailed Description

A total of 170 patients are planned to be enrolled in the study. If the patients meet the inclusion criteria and accept to participate they will be randomized to either anterior lumbar fusion or total disc replacement. The method of choice will be blinded for the patients until the two year follow up is completed.

Follow-up: after one and two years. Questionnairs: ODI, VAS, EuroQol, and GA Flexion- Extension X-ray after one and two years Complications will be retrieved from the patient journals.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with disabling pain from degenerative disc disease(DDD) both clinical and radiological, in one or two segments of the lumbar spine from L4-S1, were prolonged conservative treatment has failed.
  • •The patient should be able to understand swedish written and spoken.
  • •The patient should be between the ages 18-
  • •The patient has to accept to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • •More than two degenerated segments.
  • •Degeneration above the L4 segment.
  • •Did not agree to participate in the study
  • •Previous history of tumor, vertebral fracture, infection, lumbar fusion and dominating leg pain.
  • •Need for posterior decompression
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Psychiatric illness or drug abuse

Arms & Interventions

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Experimental

Surgical treatment Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Intervention: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Procedure)

Total disc replacement

Active Comparator

Surgical treatment total disc replacement in the lumbar spine

Intervention: Total Disc Replacement (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

ODI, Oswestry Disability Index

Time Frame: Two years

ODI questionnaire. ODI (Oswestry disability index, self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel, 0-5 zero indicating the least amount of disability and 5 indicating most severe disability)

Secondary Outcomes

  • VAS, Visual Analogue Scale(Two years)
  • Segment Mobility(Two years)
  • Patient reported back pain after two years in Swespine national registry(Two years)

Investigators

Sponsor
Svante Berg
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Svante Berg

MD, PhD

Karolinska Institutet

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials