To compare the effectiveness of two type of appliances in bringing the lower jaw forward.
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/04/024611
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Ishita Dubey
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Skeletal and dental Class II malocclusion due to retrognathic mandible
Normal to low-angled growth pattern
Minimum crowding in the lower dental arch
Exclusion Criteria
Presence of active periodontal or gingival disease
Those with extracted or congenitally missing permanent teeth
Mentally challenged patients
Subjects with any known systemic disease
Subject with vertical growth pattern
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare and evaluate the therapeutic effects of fixed twin block appliance vs fixed functional appliance in skeletal Class 2 malocclusionTimepoint: 8 months starting from 20/2/2020
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of the patient comfort with the fixed twin block applianceTimepoint: 3 months