Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04338139
NCT04338139UnknownNot Applicable

Influence of Bio-Oss Collagen Grafting at Implant Placement on Buccal Bone Volume Regeneration: a Human Study

Saint-Joseph University2 sites in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
30
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
linear measurements on the superimposed CBCTs of the buccal bone width gain at different locations

Study Overview

Brief Summary

to validate the capacity of bio-oss collagen (xenograft block+ collagen type I) placed solely without a membrane on a thin (0.5-1.8mm) buccal bone wall after delayed implant placement to regenerate bone volume. 30 patients requiring dental implants and presenting a deficient bone ridge (a ridge with reduced marginal bone width ≤ 2mm) were selected. The bone regeneration technique used in this study:

  • Pre-operatively:

  • cone beam computed tomography CBCT

  • 1 minute mouthwash with a 0.12% Chlorhexidine solution

  • Full thickness muco-periosteal flap and ridge curettage.

  • Drilling and implant placement (any implant system)

  • Adjustment and placement of the "Bio-Oss Collagen" in the regeneration site without a fixation membrane.

  • Hermetic wound closure with U-shaped and simple stitches using 5/0 and 6/0 PGA resorbable material.

  • Post-operatively:

  • Medication:

  • Amoxicilline (1g) or Clindamycine (300mg)

  • Analgesic, (paracetamol + codeine)

  • Mouthwash with a solution of 0.12% Chlorhexidine

  • cone beam computed tomography CBCT

  • 4 months postoperatively: CBCT

Bio-oss collagen is placed on the buccal side after implant placement and adapted to have the bone defect morphology. the full thickness flap is then closed without membrane placement and the bone bock is fixed in place through sutures only. CBCT images were taken immediately postoperatively and at 4 months after bone grafting. Imaging superposition (on ITK software) and measurements of buccal bone gain were effectuated to evaluate the efficiency of this regeneration technique. evaluation of buccal bone regeneration through linear radiographic measurements and evaluation of the % of grafted bone resorption will indicate the success of this technique

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age >18 years old
  • Smoking <10 cigarettes/day (Light smoker)
  • Good general health.
  • Absence of acute infection: edema, suppuration, abscess, spontaneous bleeding.

Exclusion Criteria

  • A pregnant or nursing mother
  • Pathologies that may impair bone healing: diabetes, autoimmune diseases, corticosteroids, chemotherapy.
  • Orthodontic treatment in progress or planned
  • Adjacent risk teeth

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

linear measurements on the superimposed CBCTs of the buccal bone width gain at different locations

Time Frame: 1 year

cbct radiographic measurements

Secondary Outcomes

  • linear measurements of the amount of grafted bone resorption(1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor
Saint-Joseph University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials