I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Short-duration Surgical Procedures
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Supraglottic device success rate
研究概览
简要总结
This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.
详细描述
The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation.
The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Care Provider)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 3 Years 至 10 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •ASA grade I-II
- •operative time of ≤60 minutes
排除标准
- •age >10 years
- •ASA grade ≥II
- •current or recently resolved upper respiratory tract infection
- •presence of oropharynx or laryngeal pathologies or congenital anomalies
- •pathologies inducing reflux or increasing the possibility of aspiration
- •allergy to anaesthetic or drugs to be used, renal, cardiac or hepatic diseases, or bronchial asthma
研究组 & 干预措施
i gel
I gel LMA was inserted for all patients
干预措施: LMA i gel (Other)
Air Q LMA
Air Q LMA was inserted for all patients
干预措施: LMA i gel (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Supraglottic device success rate
时间窗: 60 minutes
Fitness of LMA for ventilation
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Ayman Anis Metry
Assistant professor
Ain Shams University
