Clinical Benefits of the Closed Loop Stimulation in Sinus Node Disease
- Conditions
- Sinus Node Disease
- Interventions
- Device: DDD(R)Device: DDD+CLS
- Registration Number
- NCT02579889
- Lead Sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Brief Summary
The study is designed as a multi-center, international, prospective, parallel, randomized, single blinded trial comparing the time to first primary endpoint event (Sustained Paroxysmal AF/Persistent AF or stroke/TIA) occurrence in a follow up period of 3 years, between Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) ON versus OFF, on top of a DDD pacing in patients with pacemaker or ICD indication who require dual-chamber pacing due to sinus node disease (SND), with or without atrioventricular (AV) block.
- Detailed Description
The benefits of rate-responsiveness on top of dual-chamber pacing still need to be definitively assessed in Sinus Node Dysfunction (SND). Although many rate responsive (RR) sensors have been developed, no large clinical trials evaluated their benefits in terms of clinical endpoints such as clinically relevant atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. Electromechanical sensors (piezoelectric accelerometers) have been widely used for their simplicity and overall reliability. However there is some evidence indicating the Closed Loop Stimulation as one of the more efficient and physiological sensors.
Two randomized clinical studies have been conducted so far, showing that in the Brady-Tachy Syndrome the CLS algorithm was associated with a significantly lower overall atrial arrhythmia burden as compared both with a DDDR mode based on a standard accelerometric sensor and an atrial overdrive approach.
Both studies yielded consistent results, albeit with a parallel and intraindividual comparison designs, respectively. The atrial arrhythmic burden is an important but surrogate endpoint, not necessarily related to long-term clinical outcome. The CLS effects on AF (if any) should be investigated in terms of time to first new onset of clinically relevant AF.
In the light of these considerations, it appears interesting to run a large randomized study coherently collecting data on the overall clinical benefit of CLS, primarily in terms of AF and stroke, in a population indicated for pacemaker or ICD and needing dual-chamber pacing due to SND.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1390
- Patients with Class I or II recommendations for permanent pacing due to SND, with or without AV block according to the current guidelines;
- Patients for whom dual-chamber pacing is indicated or preferred;
- Patients with an optimized and stable antiarrhythmic medical therapy at the time of enrolment;
- Closed Loop Stimulation function was not previously activated;
- No stroke events from implant;
- Patient implanted for the first time;
- Permanent AF (PermAF)
- NYHA Class IV Heart Failure
- Stage V kidney dysfunction
- Any indication to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
- Life expectancy < 1
- Minors
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
- Participation in another interventional trial
- Atrial fibrillation ablation (left pulmonary veins) or other cardiac surgery < 3 m
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control group - CLS OFF DDD(R) Device will be programmed in a dual-chamber DDD(R) pacing mode with the Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) function OFF Active group - CLS ON DDD+CLS Device will be programmed in a dual-chamber DDD pacing mode with the Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) function ON; Intervention: DDD+CLS
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First event of Sustained Paroxysmal AF or Persistent AF or stroke or TIA, whichever comes first. three years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Persistent AF Three years Assess the date of each events of peristent AF occurred during the follow-up periods
Sustained Paroxysmal AF (SPAF) Three years Assess the date of each events of SPAF occurred during the follow-up periods
Stroke/TIA Three years Assess the date of each events of stroke/TIA occurred during the follow-up periods
Worsening Heart failure Hospitalization (wHF-H) Three years Assess the date of each events of wHF-H occurred during the follow-up periods
Permanent AF Three years Assess the date when AF is declared permanent
All cause mortality Three years
Trial Locations
- Locations (54)
Nuovo Ospedale Santo Stefano
๐ฎ๐นPrato, Italy
Sejong General Hospital
๐ฐ๐ทBucheon, Korea, Republic of
Ospedale di Treviso
๐ฎ๐นTreviso, Italy
Korea University Anam Hospital
๐ฐ๐ทSeoul, Korea, Republic of
Seul National University Bundang Hospital
๐ฐ๐ทGyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
China Medical University Hospital
๐จ๐ณTaichung, Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital
๐จ๐ณTaipei, Taiwan
Ospedale "Bolognini"
๐ฎ๐นSeriate, Bergamo, Italy
Ospedale Civile SS. Annunziata
๐ฎ๐นSavigliano, Cuneo, Italy
Policlinico Umberto I
๐ฎ๐นRoma, Italy
Policlinico Casilino
๐ฎ๐นRoma, Italy
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
๐จ๐ณTaipei, Taiwan
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
๐ฎ๐นTorrette, Ancona, Italy
Ospedale Maria SS Addolorata
๐ฎ๐นEboli, Salerno, Italy
Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
๐จ๐ณWuhan, Jinghan District, China
ASST Valle Olona - Ospedale Sant'Antonio Abate
๐ฎ๐นGallarate, Italy
Ospedale Vito Fazzi
๐ฎ๐นLecce, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera "S. Maria" di Terni
๐ฎ๐นTerni, Italy
Ospedale Ferdinando Veneziale
๐ฎ๐นIsernia, Italy
The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
๐จ๐ณHarbin, Nangang District, China
Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
๐จ๐ณBeijing, West City District, China
A.O.U. Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
๐ฎ๐นCatania, Italy
ASST RHODENSE - Ospedale Guido Salvini
๐ฎ๐นGarbagnate, Italy
Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli"
๐ฎ๐นAcquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
Max Super Speciality Hospital
๐ฎ๐ณNew Delhi, India
Ospedale di Conegliano
๐ฎ๐นConegliano, Treviso, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Consorziale
๐ฎ๐นBari, Italy
Ospedale Fabrizio Spaziani
๐ฎ๐นFrosinone, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
๐ฎ๐นPadova, Italy
Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia
๐ฎ๐นPerugia, Italy
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
๐ฎ๐นRom, Italy
Presidio Ospedaliero Ospedale Sant'Anna
๐ฎ๐นSan Fermo della Battaglia, Como, Italy
Ospedale F. Ferrari
๐ฎ๐นCasarano, Lecce, Italy
Ospedale Santa Maria della Stella
๐ฎ๐นOrvieto, Terni, Italy
Hospital Serdang
๐ฒ๐พKajang, Malaysia
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
๐ช๐ธMadrid, Spain
Ospedale di Rho
๐ฎ๐นRho, Italia, Italy
Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli
๐ฎ๐นCampobasso, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Caserta Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano
๐ฎ๐นCaserta, Italy
Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova
๐ฎ๐นFirenze, Italy
Nuovo Ospedale delle Apuane
๐ฎ๐นMassa, Italy
Ospedale V. Monaldi
๐ฎ๐นNapoli, Italy
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
๐ญ๐บBudapest, Hungary
Seul National University Hospital
๐ฐ๐ทSeoul, Korea, Republic of
Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Bucheon
๐ฐ๐ทBucheon, Korea, Republic of
National Heart Center Singapore
๐ธ๐ฌSingapore, Singapore
A.O.U Maggiore della Caritร di Novara
๐ฎ๐นNovara, Italy
Ospedale "Maria Paternรฒ Arezzo"
๐ฎ๐นRagusa, Italy
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
๐ช๐ธAlicante, Spain
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
๐ธ๐ฌSingapore, Singapore
A.O.P. Federico II
๐ฎ๐นNapoli, Italy
Ospedale Infermi di Rimini
๐ฎ๐นRimini, Italy
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
๐ฐ๐ทYangsan, Korea, Republic of
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
๐จ๐ณTainan, Taiwan