MedPath

Clinical Benefits of the Closed Loop Stimulation in Sinus Node Disease

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Sinus Node Disease
Interventions
Device: DDD(R)
Device: DDD+CLS
Registration Number
NCT02579889
Lead Sponsor
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Brief Summary

The study is designed as a multi-center, international, prospective, parallel, randomized, single blinded trial comparing the time to first primary endpoint event (Sustained Paroxysmal AF/Persistent AF or stroke/TIA) occurrence in a follow up period of 3 years, between Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) ON versus OFF, on top of a DDD pacing in patients with pacemaker or ICD indication who require dual-chamber pacing due to sinus node disease (SND), with or without atrioventricular (AV) block.

Detailed Description

The benefits of rate-responsiveness on top of dual-chamber pacing still need to be definitively assessed in Sinus Node Dysfunction (SND). Although many rate responsive (RR) sensors have been developed, no large clinical trials evaluated their benefits in terms of clinical endpoints such as clinically relevant atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. Electromechanical sensors (piezoelectric accelerometers) have been widely used for their simplicity and overall reliability. However there is some evidence indicating the Closed Loop Stimulation as one of the more efficient and physiological sensors.

Two randomized clinical studies have been conducted so far, showing that in the Brady-Tachy Syndrome the CLS algorithm was associated with a significantly lower overall atrial arrhythmia burden as compared both with a DDDR mode based on a standard accelerometric sensor and an atrial overdrive approach.

Both studies yielded consistent results, albeit with a parallel and intraindividual comparison designs, respectively. The atrial arrhythmic burden is an important but surrogate endpoint, not necessarily related to long-term clinical outcome. The CLS effects on AF (if any) should be investigated in terms of time to first new onset of clinically relevant AF.

In the light of these considerations, it appears interesting to run a large randomized study coherently collecting data on the overall clinical benefit of CLS, primarily in terms of AF and stroke, in a population indicated for pacemaker or ICD and needing dual-chamber pacing due to SND.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1390
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with Class I or II recommendations for permanent pacing due to SND, with or without AV block according to the current guidelines;
  • Patients for whom dual-chamber pacing is indicated or preferred;
  • Patients with an optimized and stable antiarrhythmic medical therapy at the time of enrolment;
  • Closed Loop Stimulation function was not previously activated;
  • No stroke events from implant;
  • Patient implanted for the first time;
Exclusion Criteria
  • Permanent AF (PermAF)
  • NYHA Class IV Heart Failure
  • Stage V kidney dysfunction
  • Any indication to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
  • Life expectancy < 1
  • Minors
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
  • Participation in another interventional trial
  • Atrial fibrillation ablation (left pulmonary veins) or other cardiac surgery < 3 m

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control group - CLS OFFDDD(R)Device will be programmed in a dual-chamber DDD(R) pacing mode with the Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) function OFF
Active group - CLS ONDDD+CLSDevice will be programmed in a dual-chamber DDD pacing mode with the Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) function ON; Intervention: DDD+CLS
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First event of Sustained Paroxysmal AF or Persistent AF or stroke or TIA, whichever comes first.three years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Persistent AFThree years

Assess the date of each events of peristent AF occurred during the follow-up periods

Sustained Paroxysmal AF (SPAF)Three years

Assess the date of each events of SPAF occurred during the follow-up periods

Stroke/TIAThree years

Assess the date of each events of stroke/TIA occurred during the follow-up periods

Worsening Heart failure Hospitalization (wHF-H)Three years

Assess the date of each events of wHF-H occurred during the follow-up periods

Permanent AFThree years

Assess the date when AF is declared permanent

All cause mortalityThree years

Trial Locations

Locations (54)

Nuovo Ospedale Santo Stefano

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Prato, Italy

Sejong General Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Bucheon, Korea, Republic of

Ospedale di Treviso

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Treviso, Italy

Korea University Anam Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Seul National University Bundang Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

China Medical University Hospital

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Taichung, Taiwan

National Taiwan University Hospital

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Taipei, Taiwan

Ospedale "Bolognini"

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Seriate, Bergamo, Italy

Ospedale Civile SS. Annunziata

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Savigliano, Cuneo, Italy

Policlinico Umberto I

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Roma, Italy

Policlinico Casilino

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Roma, Italy

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Taipei, Taiwan

Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Torrette, Ancona, Italy

Ospedale Maria SS Addolorata

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Eboli, Salerno, Italy

Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Wuhan, Jinghan District, China

ASST Valle Olona - Ospedale Sant'Antonio Abate

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Gallarate, Italy

Ospedale Vito Fazzi

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Lecce, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera "S. Maria" di Terni

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Terni, Italy

Ospedale Ferdinando Veneziale

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Isernia, Italy

The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Harbin, Nangang District, China

Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Beijing, West City District, China

A.O.U. Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Catania, Italy

ASST RHODENSE - Ospedale Guido Salvini

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Garbagnate, Italy

Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli"

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy

Max Super Speciality Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

New Delhi, India

Ospedale di Conegliano

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Conegliano, Treviso, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Consorziale

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Bari, Italy

Ospedale Fabrizio Spaziani

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Frosinone, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Padova, Italy

Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Perugia, Italy

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Rom, Italy

Presidio Ospedaliero Ospedale Sant'Anna

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

San Fermo della Battaglia, Como, Italy

Ospedale F. Ferrari

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Casarano, Lecce, Italy

Ospedale Santa Maria della Stella

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Orvieto, Terni, Italy

Hospital Serdang

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ

Kajang, Malaysia

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ

Madrid, Spain

Ospedale di Rho

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Rho, Italia, Italy

Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Campobasso, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera di Caserta Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Caserta, Italy

Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Firenze, Italy

Nuovo Ospedale delle Apuane

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Massa, Italy

Ospedale V. Monaldi

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Napoli, Italy

Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center

๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ

Budapest, Hungary

Seul National University Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Bucheon

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Bucheon, Korea, Republic of

National Heart Center Singapore

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ

Singapore, Singapore

A.O.U Maggiore della Caritร  di Novara

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Novara, Italy

Ospedale "Maria Paternรฒ Arezzo"

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Ragusa, Italy

Hospital General Universitario de Alicante

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ

Alicante, Spain

Tan Tock Seng Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ

Singapore, Singapore

A.O.P. Federico II

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Napoli, Italy

Ospedale Infermi di Rimini

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

Rimini, Italy

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท

Yangsan, Korea, Republic of

National Cheng Kung University Hospital

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Tainan, Taiwan

ยฉ Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath