Evaluating the relationship between the radial pulse wave and gynecological disease
- Conditions
- Risk factors in gynecological diseasesUrological and Genital Diseases
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN20480882
- Lead Sponsor
- Taipei City Hospital
- Brief Summary
2019 Abstract results in https://doi.org/10.1161/res.125.suppl_1.176 (added 13/09/2022) 2019 Abstract results in https://doi.org/10.1161/res.125.suppl_1.445 (added 13/09/2022) 2019 Abstract results in https://doi.org/10.1161/res.125.suppl_1.446 (added 13/09/2022) 2019 Abstract results in https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.10139 (added 13/09/2022) 2021 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34507667/ (added 13/09/2022) 2021 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34714885/ (added 13/09/2022)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 825
1. Patients with gynecological diseases
2. Over 20 years old
Severe diseases or acute symptoms are excluded if the pressure wave measurement could not be performed
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Radial blood pressure wave is assessed using a miniature pressure transducer (TD01C, Taiwan) at time of enrollment<br>2. Hormones (such as E2, LH, FSH and Prolactin) are assessed using blood test at time of enrollment<br>3. CA-125 and AFP are assessed using blood test at time of enrollment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Physician diagnosis from the medical record at time of enrollment.