Heart Failure Resilience Intervention for Caregivers
- Conditions
- Heart FailureCaregivers
- Interventions
- Behavioral: HEROIC
- Registration Number
- NCT03963583
- Lead Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Brief Summary
Heart failure (HF) patients with supportive caregivers have better physical health, emotional health, and quality of life. But caregivers have an increased risk of caregivers' own worsening health and often feel a sense of burden related to caregiving. However, caregivers receive very little support to balance caring for the patient with caring for themselves. Therefore, this research will provide a program for caregivers of advanced heart failure patients to build on the caregiver's strengths, sense of purpose, and set goals for healthy lifestyle changes. The investigators believe that caregivers who receive the program will have better quality of life, less sense of burden, and a healthier lifestyle.
- Detailed Description
Aim 1) Develop the intervention through focus groups and human-centered design with key stakeholders with particular focus on race, gender and financial strain. Key stakeholders including patients, caregivers and healthcare providers will discuss prototypes and refine intervention components through human-centered design.
Aim 2) Refine intervention components through an open label pilot (N=5) of the intervention, followed by in-depth interviews. We will assess the salient features of the novel intervention components using mixed methods including examination of all quantitative measures and qualitative interviews to explore acceptability, participant/interventionist interactions, home environment factors, goal achievement and perceived value of intervention. Intervention components will be adapted for the trial based on results of aims 1 and 2.
Aim 3) Conduct a single-masked, waitlist control pilot trial of the HEROIC intervention (N=36). We hypothesize that caregivers who receive the intervention will show greater improvement in primary outcomes (preventive health behaviors, caregiver burden and QOL) and potential mechanisms (self-efficacy and biomarkers of resilience \[interleukins 6 and 10\]) than control caregivers.
Randomization: Caregivers will be randomized using a computer algorithm via REDCap to receive either: (1) intervention or (2) waitlist. Random assignment will be stratified by spousal vs non-spousal caregivers due to increased burden among non-spousal caregivers.
Waitlisted Control Group: The waitlisted group will receive usual care for caregivers for the first 16 weeks, which is normally limited to inclusion in some clinical assessment and teaching during patient visits. Waitlisted participants will receive monthly study postcards to encourage retention. After 16 weeks, they will begin the intervention.
Setting:
Aim 1: Key Stakeholder meetings will be held at the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, which is located within walking distance of the Heart Failure Bridge Clinic and supported by the Community Research Advisory Council.
Aims 2-3: Study visits will be conducted in the home of the caregiver.
Intervention Components
The intervention will be guided by the theory and evidence-based practices that have been successful in previous work. For the proposed study, every participant will receive each component of the intervention but interventionists will tailor content to each participant's goals. The investigators will focus on overall preventive health behaviors broadly categorized as physical activity, stress management, rest, healthy diet and appropriate healthcare utilization. As part of the intervention, the nurse and the caregiver will discuss preventive health categories. In this conversation, the caregiver will prioritize the preventive health categories that they would most like to address and then set goals towards them. Allowing the caregiver maximum control over this goal-setting, without placing additional burden on the caregiver is one aspect of increasing self-efficacy and person-centeredness. Because the intervention will allow participants to pick their own health goals, the investigators will measure goal attainment related to preventive health behaviors, rather than a standardized survey of predetermined preventive health behaviors.
Intervention Delivery/Study Visits
The intervention delivery characteristics will consist of an assessment-driven, tailored package of interventions delivered by a nurse interventionist. Nurse interventionists will be trained and equipped with education materials vetted by national organizations leading preventive health research such as the American Heart Association (Healthy for Good) and National Institute of Aging (Go4Life). The investigators propose an intervention incorporating 3 individualized, nurse-led, home-based sessions, with telephone check-ins and text reminders, according to participant preference. Baseline, 16 and 32-week data will be collected by interviewers masked to treatment assignment and without interventionist contact.
Interventional Protocol
The nurse will meet with the caregiver to perform the initial assessment in which the nurse will focus on preventive health behaviors and factors contributing to a sense of burden. To build rapport and model the importance of physical activity, the nurse will allow the caregiver to choose a short physical activity (ie. Walk around the block, 2 minutes of dancing etc). In this assessment, the nurse and the caregiver identify and prioritize goals, and make plans to achieve those goals. The nurse will provide the HEROIC Handbook, which will be developed following aim 1 and include evidence-based educational materials, contact information, and a calendar of sessions that the participant keeps for reference. In each session, the nurse assesses goal attainment, reinforces strategy use, reviews problem-solving, refines strategies (such as Go4Life physical activities and Healthy for Good materials), and provides education and resources to address future needs. Following the session, the nurse will find additional resources, tailored to each caregiver. In the final session, the nurse reviews the participants' strategies and helps to generalize them to other possible challenges or goals. Sessions will be spaced to encourage practicing new strategies independently after developing them together with the nurse. Although this intervention structure has been successful in work by the mentorship team, the investigators will adjust the timing and frequency of study visits based on feedback in phases 1 and 2. Bi-monthly meetings of the nurse with the site Research Coordinator and the principal investigator will ensure smooth communication, address challenges, supervision, and adherence to intervention fidelity.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HEROIC Intervention Group HEROIC This group will receive the HEROIC intervention. Waitlist Control Group HEROIC The waitlisted group will receive usual care for caregivers for the first 12 weeks, which is normally limited to inclusion in some clinical assessment and teaching during patient visits. Waitlisted participants will receive monthly study postcards to encourage retention. After 12 weeks, they will begin the intervention.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Goal Attainment of Preventive Health Behaviors as measured by the Goal Attainment Scale Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks 4-item, 5-point scale to measure self-perceived attainment of goals implementing health-promoting behaviors. Participants weight the importance and difficulty of each goal. Scores range from -2 to 2. Scores greater than zero indicate goal attainment, less than zero indicate negative progress.
Change in Caregiver Burden as assessed by the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks We will use the task difficulty and time caring subscales of the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale, which include 15 likert scale items. Scores range from 15-75. Higher scores indicate great task difficulty and more time spent on each task, higher burden.
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Neurological Quality of Life(Neuro-QOL) Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks 9-Item Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL). Items are scored on a 1-5 range, with total summary score calculated. Higher scores indicate a more favorable quality of life.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Self-Efficacy as assessed by the Coping Self Efficacy Scale Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks The coping self-efficacy scale has 13 items, each scored 0-10. Scores range from 0-130. Higher scores indicate higher coping self-efficacy.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Johns Hopkins School of Nursing
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States