The ThinkCancer! Intervention: Protocol for a Feasibility Study Incorporating a Randomised Pilot Trial With an Embedded Process and Economic Evaluation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 24
- 试验地点
- 7
- 主要终点
- Feasibility of a future definitive trial
研究概览
简要总结
Background Wales, like other UK countries, has relatively poor cancer outcomes. Late diagnosis and a slow referral process are major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) and other care providers working in primary care are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safety netting can be used to manage diagnostic uncertainty by ensuring patients with vague symptoms are appropriately monitored. The ThinkCancer! Workshop is an educational behaviour change intervention aimed at the whole general medical practice team, designed to improve primary care approaches to ensure timely diagnosis of cancer. The workshop will consist of teaching and awareness sessions, appointment of a Safety Netting Champion and the development of a bespoke Safety Netting Plan. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the ThinkCancer! Intervention for a future definitive randomised controlled trial, in terms of recruitment, randomisation, retention, acceptability, adherence and barriers to the intervention.
Methods The ThinkCancer! study is a randomised, multisite feasibility trial, with an embedded process evaluation and economic evaluation. Twenty-three to 30 general medical practices will be recruited across Wales, randomised in a ratio of 2:1 of intervention versus control who will follow usual care. The workshop will be delivered by a GP educator, and will be adapted iteratively throughout the trial period. Baseline practice characteristics will be collected via questionnaire. We will also collect Primary Care Interval (PCI), Two Week Wait (2WW) referral rate, conversion rate and detection rate at baseline and six months post-randomisation. Participant feedback, researcher reflective notes and economic costings will be collected following each workshop. A process evaluation will assess implementation using an adapted Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire and qualitative interviews. An economic feasibility analysis will inform a future economic evaluation.
Discussion This study will allow us to test and further develop a novel evidenced-based complex intervention aimed at general practice teams to expedite the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. The results from this feasibility study will inform the future design of a full-scale definitive phase III trial.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Any practices in Wales are eligible for inclusion.
排除标准
- •As we intend to include a broad group of general medical practices, there are no formal exclusion criteria.
- •As determining feasibility is the main objective of this study, the eligibility criteria remain broad in order to allow for inclusion of a range of practices, which will aid the intervention refinement and allow for a better understanding on what is feasible in all types of practices and why some practices may not take part.
研究组 & 干预措施
Usual practice
Usual practice
Intervention
Receives educational workshop
干预措施: ThinkCancer workshop (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Feasibility of a future definitive trial
时间窗: From date of initial expression of interest to participate to end of follow up period (13 months)
Number of practices approached, interested in participating, consented and randomised, retention of recruited practices, ability to collect data
次要结局
- Primary Care Interval(Six months pre-randomisation and six months post-randomisation)
- Two Week Wait referral rate(Six months pre-randomisation and six months post-randomisation)
