Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01818739
NCT01818739
Completed
Not Applicable

Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Staging: Comparison of Isosulfan Blue and Indocyanine Green Dyes With Fluorescence Imaging

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center2 sites in 1 country204 target enrollmentMarch 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
sentinel lymph node detection
Conditions
Endometrial Cancer
Sponsor
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Enrollment
204
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Negative Predictive Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Prediction of Metastatic Disease
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This clinical trial studies lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer. Lymph node mapping may allow for limited removal of lymph nodes in as part of endometrial cancer staging and treatment.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To estimate the negative predictive value of pelvic sentinel lymph node (SLN) in endometrial cancer to predict nodal metastasis. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: II. To examine the ability of sentinel lymph nodes to increase the detection of metastatic disease through ultra-sectioning and immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining by comparing IHC results and standard hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) results. OUTLINE: Patients undergo sentinel lymph node detection using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green solution and isosulfan blue and sentinel lymph node biopsy and detection of sentinel lymph nodes is noted in the within 30 minutes of injection of the dye, followed by full pelvic lymph node dissection and aortic lymph node dissection as indicated, and standard hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years for a total of 5 years according to the standard surveillance guidelines for endometrial cancer.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2013
End Date
March 31, 2017
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Floor Backes

Principal Investigator

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The patient must be willing and able to provide informed consent
  • The patient is willing and able to comply with the study protocol
  • The patient has endometrial cancer and is scheduled for robotic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy
  • The patient agrees to follow-up examinations out to 5-years post-treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • The patient is not a candidate for robotic assisted hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy
  • The patient has known or suspected allergies to iodine, indocyanine green (ICG) or isosulfan blue (ISB)
  • The patient has hepatic dysfunction confirmed by bilirubin \> 2 x normal (based on reference values from the laboratory used by the patient)

Arms & Interventions

sentinel lymph node detection

Patients undergo sentinel lymph node detection using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green solution and isosulfan blue and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Intervention: sentinel lymph node detection

sentinel lymph node detection

Patients undergo sentinel lymph node detection using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green solution and isosulfan blue and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Intervention: indocyanine green solution

sentinel lymph node detection

Patients undergo sentinel lymph node detection using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green solution and isosulfan blue and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Intervention: isosulfan blue

sentinel lymph node detection

Patients undergo sentinel lymph node detection using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green solution and isosulfan blue and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Intervention: sentinel lymph node biopsy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Negative Predictive Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Prediction of Metastatic Disease

Time Frame: average of 1-14 days after the procedure when final pathologic evaluation has been completed

NPV is found by dividing the number of true negatives by the number of all patients without pelvic lymph node metastases. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the proportions will be calculated.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of Metastatic Cases Found Using Ultra-sectioning and IHC Staining(average of 1-14 days after the procedure when final pathologic evalulation has been completed)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials